discusseded

joined 1 year ago
[–] discusseded@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

By far it's the object pipeline. Having structured data makes it easy to automate workflows in a predictable way. With bash everything is a string, so everything has to be parsed. It's tedious.

It took about a year of steady use before I came to enjoy the syntax. It shines in a production environment with other cooks in the kitchen. I never got into the C style, I like my code human readable at a glance. It's fine if everyone's a sage but we have a team with a mixture of skill levels and for me PowerShell gets it right.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I did install it on one of my machines but haven't dug in yet. I'm curious to see how much of my workflow will translate to Linux, yet at the same time I want to make sure I'm actually learning Linux and not using PS as a crutch.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the reference. I'm looking at it and I think you're right.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago (15 children)

After learning PowerShell and then moving to Linux and having to learn bash...I don't get this sentiment. PS is the shit. I can make full GUI applications and automate all kinds of workflows. Their use of objects makes it so easy to extract data and utilize it. Bash feels so much more primitive and clumsy by comparison. What am I missing here?

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I loooove my openSUSE desktop. 11 was the last straw. No amount of AI is going to bring me back.

I HATE advertisements, and I paid for Pro but it seemed like they didn't care. They want to milk me for everything I'm worth.

Good thing we have options. Linux has gotten so good, it's better than Windows 11 while letting me decide how to use the OS. Big learning curve, but it's smooth sailing when you get past it.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

Our ticketing system has "untrained user" and "works as designed, not as expected" as options. Can't fix the problem if you don't know its nature.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

I hear a lot about those distros around here. I recently settled on openSUSE Tumbleweed after having used Fedora and ZorinOS for a while. It's so good, I haven't thought about switching to anything else. Manjaro, Pop_os, and NixOS are on my list if that ever changes.

I like AppImage a lot and I wonder why that didn't take off like Flatpak did. A timing issue, perhaps?

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah AppX is a different kind of application platform that was built to be secure. Breaking that security breaks functionality. What's lame is that they don't have mechanisms to allow you to change permissions at a granular level and then change them back to defaults. You have to hack it and deal with the consequences which is just bad design.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Appx is locked down tight on purpose. It's built to be a more secure application platform than exe.

Not saying it's right and you should have to deal, but that's why.

Editing to say I also went Linux last year and I love it far too much to ever go back to Windows. Flatpaks are similar to AppX but at least you can customize the permissions for them. Still I find them to be a bit of a pain to use for some apps.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

I like it at work and used to like it at home until I ran out of space and was forced to make financial decisions. Now I use a cheap used server and Nextcloud/Syncthing.

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Your wallet is pretty fucked but I got a 2023 Honda Odyssey and I never loved an automobile like this in my life. It's a perfect vehicle by my measure.

view more: ‹ prev next ›