You've made an awful lot of bad assumptions about me based on a single question that you haven't answered.
Seriously. What's up? You're responding with a great amount of negativity. You've accused me of gaslighting and being moronic with no provocation that would warrant either response.
I have presented no take.
Are you doing ok? What's bothering you?
Why do you view these as issues to be overcome?
The peering agreements are based on network traffic of the customers. Passing through costs to customers is always a thing.
Peering agreements have been around for a long time on the internet, they're part the backbone of the internet.
Peering agreements for internet traffic, what a stupid concept.
Doesn't help that they have offered no explanation at all.
Discoverablility of what?
Tux is a blackbelt in Karate, and has many combat skills including using Katanas and flips (which he learned from Kat and Ana). Tux also has an iq of 135. He's also a skilled Marksman. He's good at driving, can slide on his belly, and is resistant to extreme cold, being a penguin. He's also a good general, and of course, he's great at using Computers. Mostly Linux, but he can use Windows a bit too. He's especially good at Emulation.
LOL
At least I got a laugh out of it. It does seem pretty useless as a reference though.
How would this help? What is the problem this addresses?
I wanted to understand their perspective. But that doesn't seem to be something they are willing to share in any more detail.
There was no implication being made.
What measure of difficulty of content discovery are you using to determine that it is difficult? What would not difficult content discovery be? What content is there is desired to be discovered What do you mean by, 'there is no "why" here'?
I have many questions about how people perceive the current state of things and what they view as potential areas for improvement.