exocrinous

joined 1 year ago
[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

And they ALL suck!

Polearms win 90% of the time

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Miss you with the greatest passion

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago

No, it's observation. An experiment involves manipulating an independent variable while controlling other variables. There's none of that in space, not counting the ISS and Apollo. That said, you can still test hypotheses using observation. And that's equally true in both astronomy and in social sciences.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's irrelevant. Astronomy and polsci can both only test their hypotheses through observation.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What are soft sciences supposed to do when experimental methods are either impractical or unethical?

Same thing astronomy did.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey genius, if you need experimentation in order for a field to be a real science, then explain how astronomy is a science.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

It's mainly called social science in my country.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same with Astronomy.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago

Y'all straight people who only just heard of this discourse should spend more time listening to asexuals

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

They’re just being puritanical or shy with their movie watching company.

Or asexual and sex repulsed, or sexually traumatized. Why do you jump straight to calling people reactionaries when there are perfectly good legitimate reasons for their behaviour? It's almost like you don't believe in asexuals.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Can't you red card the bullies?

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the last one was One so this one must be Two

view more: ‹ prev next ›