In theory, yes. But if you follow the link and that leads to downloading the JS and running it, you're already too late inspecting it.
And even if you review it once (and it wasn't too large or obfuscated via minification), the next time you load a page, the JS can be different. I guess there could be a web browser extension for pinning the code?
The only practial alternative I know of is to have a local client you can review once (and after updates).
So the trick is to use the #fragment part of the URL, that is not sent to the server.
Of course the JS one downloads from the server could easily upload it to it, so you still need to trust the JS.
Alas my game PC is going to stick with Windows due to bad state of VR in Linux :/. And therefore one day it might need to update to Windows 11.
In particular if you have a headset that is not Valve Index, though apparently with Meta Quest one can use ALVR, as long as you get the actual games running.
Indeed, warranties usually don't cover misuse anyway.
Then there are the cases where you want the LLM to actually interact with the page, using the current web page state and your credentials.
For example, one might want to tell it to uncheck all the "opt in" checkboxes in the page.. And express this task in plain English language.
Many useful interactive agent tasks could be achieved with this. The chatbot would be merely the first step.
I haven't done it, but you could try socket activation.
Then you certainly shouldn't! But if I have one icecream in my hand, I'll much prefer go to the self-checkout instead of queuing to the register.
One local store also has a hand-held scanner/terminal you can use while shopping. I think I could do big shopping with that as well, it's less of a chore do it while shopping. Previously I had only seen those at wholesale stores for businesses.
Maybe consider static ip assignment in your DHCP server (e.g. internet router) if at all possible.. Then you can add a name to it to /etc/hosts.
Alternatively you could use Avahi to provide mdns names to your local network
Do you have that file? If not, then unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK will work just as well.
If it does exist, then I suppose it has good chances of working correctly :). ssh-add -l will try to use that socket and list your keys in the service (or list nothing if there are no keys, but it would still work without error).
At the end of the log you find:
822413 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/run/user/1000/gcr/ssh"}, 110) = 0
...
822413 read(4,
meaning it's trying to interact with the ssh-agent, but it (finally) doesn't give a response.
Use the lsof command to figure out which program is providing the agent service and try to resolve issue that way. If it's not the OpenSSH ssh-agent, then maybe you can disable its ssh-agent functionality and use real ssh-agent in its place..
My wild guess is that the program might be trying to interactively verify the use of the key from you, but it is not succeeding in doing that for some reason.
I guess it's worth checking if those names point to the expected binaries, but I also think it would be highly unlikely they would be anything else than just /usr/bin/ssh and /usr/bin/ssh-agent.
Where should they be "taking" funding instead?