He may have PTSD and he may have had 1,000 hours of firearms training, but if you empty your magazine the way he did, under the circumstances he did, you're incompetent to be a police officer. Period.
And even he apparently recognizes that since he resigned (though whether he'll just go get hired the next town over is probably a decent bet).
It's a race to the bottom.
Yes, you can decline to opt in, but the guy next to you (or the guy next to him) will opt in and sell his AI voice package for less than it costs to employ a real person. And unlike a real person, the AI voice package can work 24/7 on 10,000 productions at the same time.
If anyone can opt in, then no one can really opt out.
Is this a good thing? For the bottom line of the people making the games, sure. And maybe 3% of that savings will trickle down to the consumer.
But it's pretty bad for the voice actors.
The latest fad.
The board has given no real reasoning for why they fired him. Until they do, there's no reason anyone should consider this anything other than an internal power struggle that resulted in a coup.
And Sam didn't have a job anymore. Why shouldn't he go work for Microsoft? He was pushed out of OpenAI, is he contractually bound to never do something different?
There's something in the article about auto-delete policies.
If those policies violated a recordkeeping requirement maybe a jury could infer it was done intentionally in furtherance of a crime
Or maybe even if it was set to auto delete messages after some really unusually short period. By that I mean if you configured it to delete messages after a few days it might be hard to explain the legitimate business purpose served by such a rule.
The real scam is that that video is 15 min long.
Indicted in 2016 on witness coercion and the case is still "pending"...? Can I be forgiven for thinking there was no intent on ever bringing that to trial?
I mean, he got shot and he's recovered so.. in this case the consequences were definitely reversible.
I'm pretty sure it just drop ships you Chinese garbage from alibaba.
Because that's what the supreme court ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen.
They just made that up, but that's where we're at now.
It was from Sidney Powell. She filed some baseless lawsuit regarding the election and claimed she was going to "release the kraken".
I think the Q crowd latched on to that and it was just particularly hashtag-able.
??
Doesn't everyone pick their ideals to care about?