[-] furikuri@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

I suppose it's to stop a critical mass of promoters commenting "and my axe" among themselves? I agree though it doesn't really feel right to encourage more low effort posts

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

PRE-SUBMISSION EDIT: This is a long-winded reply and goes increasingly off-topic as it progresses, sorry. TLDR I agree

Anecdotally, I've also noticed a rapid change in the last decade or so as politicians become emboldened by Trump's success. For example, the premier of a major Canadian province has done the following:

She was previously head of the (now defunct) Wildrose party before defecting and indirectly leading to the historic 2015 election, which marked the first time a left-wing party formed a majority government in almost 80 years.

But even then the most controversial thing she said (publicly) was that 'the science on climate change "wasn't settled"', still inane but a far cry from what was to come after her return to power in 2022

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Who said it was the US government? Additionally I'd wager that the people who vote both vote independent and browse these sorts of forums are people who would otherwise vote democrat. Note that there are currently many interested parties that would benefit from a republican win at this moment

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

For fun or to play around with transpilers?

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Why single out TikTok and not Chinese nationals buying US real estate, driving up the cost of commercial and residential rents?

Heavily agree that this is equally problematic, but unfortunately it seems like the choice has already been made that real estate "investments" cannot be allowed to fail. It's the same reason why they aren't also targeting US-based companies that have been shown to have ties to foreign rivals, they're literally just playing politics. Sucks, but for now this at least opens the door for further regulation in the area

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Me when I find out that it's illegal to sell your organs for profit

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

They're talking about the Hogwarts game

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

At least the Adventurers Bible can keep it going for a little while longer

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

An amendment to the popular expression, "All [personal] information should be free", I suppose

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

Giving me status bar envy! Might have to take the plunge into eww after seeing all these configs recently

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

https://lemmy.ca/comment/2777069

After finishing her PhD, also in archaeology, she decided to follow her passion for books, and pursue a career in publishing. She worked for over 15 years in scholarly and educational book publishing, commissioning and project-managing a wide range of non-fiction titles, producing ebooks and implementing accessible publishing practices.

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

I'd assume a lot of people sell/trade as the next set rotation is coming around no? I'm not sure how card economy works in magic but in yugioh today's meta is tomorrow's budget, surely there's people that want to buy in play in non rotating formats

view more: ‹ prev next ›

furikuri

joined 11 months ago