fushuan

joined 2 years ago
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

That's not the part that was shamed, was it?

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You mean a 5th bottle of vodka, right? A 5th of a bottle of vodka is not much. That's 40% so 1/5 * 0.4 = 8%. That's like drinking a full bottle of wine, two bottles of cider or 4 pints of beer. You might get drunk but no fucking way you OD.

Most youngs need that amount to barely start getting tipsy...

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Last panel is unnecessary, this would be better in a horizontal 3 panel format.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know, thanks! I guess in hindsight I meant "official" as in, it's not just some rando, I can trust it won't break, and I don't have to manually download the stuff every time xD

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Updating itself isn't really the Linux way of things. The Linux way is to have a centralised place like pacman or apt and to download everything at once. Every app having their own download and update system sounds like a nightmare.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Thats weird, they do have an arch official package and that's the one they usually don't make because AUR is a thing. Have you checked lately?

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

It doesn't, that's Ikea's fork, I know it. It's super uncomfortable for me but I'm the neurotypical in the house, my partner only uses those.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

My partner has ADHD and autism and they swear by 5. That's IKEA's cheap fork and in our house I'm forced to use all the other forks (which are better so whatever). In their words: "all the other ones are too pointy". I don't fucking know.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I'd prefer if I didn't have to iterate twice...

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

You clearly haven't experimented with AI much in a work environment. When asked to do specific things that you are not sure if are possible it will 100% ignore part of your input and always give you a positive response at first.

"How can I automate outlook 2020 to do X?"
'You do XYZ'
me, after looking it up"that's only possible in older versions"
'You are totally right, you do IJK'
"that doesn't achieve what i asked"
'Correct, you can't do it.'

And don't get me started on APIs of actual frameworks... I've wished to punch it hard when dealing with react or spark. Luckily I usually know my stuff and only use it to find a quick example of something that I test locally before implementing if 5 mins of googling didn't give me the baseline, but the amount of colleagues that not only blindly copy code but argue with my reasoning saying "chatgpt says so" is fucking crazy.

When chatgpt says something I know is incorrect I ask for sources and there's fucking none. Because it not possible my dude.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

In my experience, after thinking what I want I ask a server to take my order. The digital menu is there as a replacement of the physical menu. All the complaints I read are about the extra things the restaurant tries to do with it. Replacing servers' tasks and abusive pricing practices. Fix those, complain about those.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I know it doesn't, I was countering your logic of "I'm a professional programmer" as if the correct interaction would be obvious to a programmer. The intended interaction requires extra thought and to be more through than the obvious one, as you have described.

view more: ‹ prev next ›