heluecht

joined 2 years ago
[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@TehPers @Kichae It doesn't matter where a project is hosted, it matters which group you are targeting and where you personally are located. So even if you would host in Russia, you won't be safe from prosecution, when you live for example in the US.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 2 points 1 year ago

@catculation I guess that he was totally happy, when nearly 9,000 workers (out of 12,500) at his factory in Germany voted for a new works council. I'm convinced that he didn't knew about German labour rights - now he does 😀

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@yogthos Well, I've got the opinion, that infrastructure shouldn't be operated for profit, so I've got no problem with investing a lot of money in advance. My points are meant from a technical standpoint. And when I refer to the costs, then I mean this in a way that I've got the opinion that the money should be invested in other stuff as well.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

@yogthos I'm not living in the US, neither I'm a fan of most of their politics. So I definitely won't defend them.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

@yogthos Which people said that about high speed rail? The country I'm living in has got high speed rail since the 90s. See also Japan or France (and some other countries).

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

@yogthos I now had more time to look into the article. The whole article is focused solely on the electromagnet technology. From here it refers to some other technology that uses electromagnet acceleration like Musk's fever dream "Hyperloop" and sea carrier catapults while in the end making a reference to orbital launch costs.

Thing is: It simply doesn't make sense. Neither in point-to-point transportation nor in space launch activities this would work out, since you could reach only a single orbital plane or flight direction. To reach more than one point or orbit, you would need to have a lot of these systems, which then would result in really high operational costs.

However, this technology is fine for a highly improved land based transportation method, especially for China, which is the forth biggest country (behind Russia, Canada and the USA).

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

@yogthos The articles ends in "While SpaceX’s reusable rockets have slashed satellite launch costs to US$3,000/kg, some scientists have estimated that an electromagnetic space launch system could drive those costs down to a mere US$60/kg."

This is a comparison to a launch into an orbit.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca -1 points 1 year ago

@yogthos I'm a space nerd, so I'm always happy to see advancements in this area. I'm no "the west is the best" guy. I'm also a fan of the Indian space program. They achieve great stuff with an astonishing low budget. And I really hope that they will launch people into space in a not so distant future.

Also I think that it is a real shame, that there is this aggressive competition in space. I would love to see all the nations cooperate in a common space program, like it had already been done, when the ISS had been built.

China is launching a lot of rockets into space. They only should stop their launches from Jiuquan, Xichang or Taiyuan, since from there they have to drop their first stages onto land in areas where people live.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@goatsarah BTW: This sounds like a super sized "Spinlaunch" in my ears - which also has got a lot of technical difficulties.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@yogthos Well, this whole article sounds like a lot of propaganda without any real facts to me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›