holo

I'm not the person you were arguing with. Based on your argument, your words, there are no consequences for discriminating against black people, and shouldn't be.

There are, if you include the law, but since we're ignoring it to make your argument work, there's no consequences.

When arguing something, trying arguing the opposite to yourself before posting.

.....No, he didn't. Just by any measure no he didn't. Even if you just limit it to US presidents, no he didn't. Nixon did more for climate change than Biden, by several orders of magnitude.

Based on your argument, free speech means no consequences. Stop being a debate bro if you're this bad at it.

You were wrong, and he thoroughly showed you how you were wrong.

By your logic being black has consequences.

I'm very familiar with that bit of misunderstanding you people tend to have, I'm trying to actually educate you on reality, instead of the opinions of the CIA.

Trusting the US government as a blahaj user seems dumb to me, but hey.

When Nazi Germany burned there was a Germany after. Sometimes something's too far gone to save.

No that's a cat.

You're going to be surprised when Dems lose 2028 and you can't blame Trump anymore.

A) No, no it's not a socialist policy to control prices with direct intervention. Learn what socialism is.

B) no one really cares. People want to live. That's about it. Harris made it clear she was not going to help as she claimed this was already a great economy that just needed to continue as usual. Trump said he'd fix things. People overwhelmingly (for US voter participation) voted the person that acknowledged issues even if they knew he was lying.