Stealing from big companies like movie studios? Whatever. Stealing from the working class? Not so great. People should 1. Have the right to not have their work used as training data and 2. If they agree to be used as training data, be compensated.
inv3r5ion
joined 1 month ago
Without the means to do it it’s not a threat.
The imagery used for the training data isn’t licensed to be used as such. It’s stolen.
The “art” that goes along with the writing (not the writing itself which I assume is your actual writing)
As an artist, the training data used for most of the image generators is stolen work. As in, the original artists didn’t give permission for their work to be used that way. Some aren’t stolen, such as adobe’s ai tools, which are trained on imagery that’s licensed for it.
As an American this holiday is news to me 😞
The words that go with it are fine, the AI image is a waste of energy and water, offensive to actual artists, and AI is just theft of artists work as “training” data.
It’s entirely deliberate. Also you forgot to add something after losing hard and often: fundraising off the loss.
This is AI garbage
I love how they’re trying to paint him as a working class hero (see the cringe NYT opinion piece as an example) when he’s a class traitor who screwed over other working class people to enrich himself.
Well is the ex a CEO?