I quit smoking using a vape and then quit vaping.
I found that it was easier to quit smoking using a vape because I kept the same motion. I needed a powerful one to feel a similar hit.
And I found it easier to stop vaping than to stop smoking because I could mix liquids to have any desired nicotine content, allowing me to reduce it very gradually. A lot of people simply replace smoking with vaping but that's still an improvement.
It seems to be more effective: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8/full
And what about the person the thieves sells it to?
Yes, it can miss informations but the data it has is reliable.
I would advice using an adblocker to block such popups. I have uBlock Origin and I wasn't asked anything.
I don't know how, I'm not very knowledgeable about this. I've never trained my own model and I don't really understand the diffences between all the machine learning algorithms.
You already made up your mind and you are only looking at things that goes your way, no matter how weak, while questioning everything that goes against it.
The world can be complexe, often not how we would like it to be. People have all sorts of contradictory beliefs. Especially if it's an American about politics.
This is not how this works. Putting some text in the prompt is not the same as training a specialised model on it.
The whois data is the forensic data. You can provide fake contact info but you can't fake the creation date.
I don't know where you found this but this is obviously about specialised models, not chatgpt. Also this is not a controlled scenario and you are not trying to match an author using known, attributed material.
The domain was literally created on December 9.
There is no best way. What matters is what works and different methods work differently on different people. It's good to have a multitude of ways.
As for efficiency it seems that vaping is very efficient.