jemikwa

joined 2 years ago
[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If you're not getting anti caking agents in shredded cheese, then what do you expect the pre-shredded cheese to do?
Might as well get a block and shred it yourself.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the same kind of deprecation you get with apps requiring a newer Android version. If Google adds new features to Android Auto that Android Nougat (7.x) can't handle, then your apps won't have any better time either. Likewise, if Google updates Android Auto but an app stops supporting 7.x and earlier, then that app will certainly break down the road.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are you using a phone from 2017 or earlier? If not, you have nothing to worry about. If so, I'm surprised it still works.
The article topic only affects phones with Android Nougat and earlier. If you're on Oreo or later (8.0+), you're fine. This has nothing to do with the car and everything to do with the phone doing the screen projection.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Adding on to a bit from your comment that I missed, it's not affecting the car itself. The article should have used the word "phone" instead of "device".
All Android Auto is a screen for your phone that also hooks into car buttons. Your phone does all the hard work with projecting data to the screen. If your phone is too old, Android Auto might not work because apps don't work properly with the base framework by Google.
You can use a new phone on an older car that officially supports Auto/CarPlay. That's never been a problem.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

If you don't update Android Auto, maybe. Apps still rely on the framework that makes it work, so you are likely to have those break if they use features that Android Auto didn't have at the update freeze.

The version they're cutting off is really old, relatively speaking. You have to be on Oreo or later (8.0+), which came out in 2017.
Many apps you would use Android Auto will likely bump up to this break point soon. Waze, for example, is 7.0+. You're bound to run into issues being on Nougat or earlier soon, if not already.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This looks to be Google ending support for the Android Auto framework on older Android versions, that's all. It's not about the car, it's about the phone.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Judging by the article and the code snippets found, it's more about updating your phone rather than the car infotainment hub. Nougat is getting the axe, have to be on Oreo or later.
It would have been better if the headline said "phones" and not "devices", but that's not as panic inducing :P

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Short answer, likely yes. It's not definitive, you could still slip by after sending enough mail, but you are also very likely to get whacked because that VPS IP doesn't have an email sending reputation.

Longer answer, email gateways like Google, Microsoft, and Proofpoint don't really care who owns what IP. Well, they might, but they're more concerned about the sending habits of an IP. While you might send good mail from that IP, there's no reputation for it, so you could be whacked for having a neutral reputation (the ol' credit score dilemma but for email).
In order to have a good reputation, you have to send a large volume of messages very gradually over several weeks to "warm" your IP as a reputable sender. I went over this slightly more in detail in another reply, but this article is pretty concise on how an enterprise accomplishes this with a dedicated IP at a provider like SendGrid: https://docs.sendgrid.com/ui/sending-email/warming-up-an-ip-address

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's about sample size. Mail gateways won't designate an IP as a reputable sending IP until it assesses a large volume of mail sent over a long period of time. You can't send the quantity it wants all at once or even in a short window because then you'll be designated as a spammer. So you start small with a few a day and gradually ramp up sending over multiple weeks or months to eventually send several thousands of messages in that period.

Spammers and malicious actors too often spin up new IPs for sending mail, so gateway patterns already implicitly mandate that email should come from IPs it's already judged reputable.

You as an individual can't reasonably warm your own IP. This is why services like Amazon SES or Sendgrid exist because they have huge IP pools that are ready to go. Plus, those services are very concerned with reputation and have bounce/complaint metrics defined to warn customers that abuse or poorly configure their sending habits.

This next example is what I'm most familiar with, but I'm sure there are other services like this. If you're a big enterprise and want your own dedicated sending IP because you're concerned about using a shared pool, you could use something like Amazon Pinpoint which allocate IPs for your org to use in SES, but they have to be warmed before you switch your production workloads over to it full-time. It automates some of the gradual-ness of warming so you use a mix of SES plus your Pinpoint IPs to keep mail flowing for your product.

It looks like Sendgrid also does dedicated IP warming guard rails too. This article is pretty decent for understanding how it works - https://docs.sendgrid.com/ui/sending-email/warming-up-an-ip-address The per-day warming limits give you an idea of what scale this kind of process is used for.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Technology Connections makes very specific, detailed videos on tech stuff, appliances, etc. My recent favorite of his is about incandescent vs LED Christmas lights and his unending rage about LED lights looking like "a computer threw up on your lawn". The first I remember watching was about dishwasher tech and how great they are, but how terrible dish pods are.

[–] jemikwa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›