jlh

joined 1 year ago
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 50 points 7 hours ago

The irony of saying that you're against the corrupt establishment and then going out and saying you're a big supporter of Donald Trump, the most corrupt, most established politician of the 2020's.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the biggest supporters of Ukraine like the nordics, baltics, and Poland don't see Russia as far way, but yes, that's the difficulty.

It's surprising that even leftist parties like Sahra Wagenknecht have become open supporters of Russian fascism in Europe.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 18 hours ago

Yup, Immigration and racism have always been a huge debate in Europe.

Some Swedish wikipedia articles i recently found about pre-ww2 immigration and refugee debates:

https://sv-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Mosaisk?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US

https://sv-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/J-passen?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US

Europe has never been ethnically homogenous.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I think its probably critical that political parties focus on defending against russian agression, even above economic issues or immigration issues. Might be time for unity governments if things start to get bad with the US and Russian fronts.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

More proof that the election was decided by the economy, not climate or abortion. Which means the opposition has a lot of leverage here to stand up to Trump's fossil fuel policies and abortion bans.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 11 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

1 is impossible due to Europe's conviction. 2 is inevitable.

I think 5 has some elements of truth, but a full on collapse would probably be the end of Putin. More minor economic problems would probably lead to koreafication around the current front line.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

100% if you fine them 6% of their global revenue for refusing safety recommendations by the EU and independent auditors

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-enforcement

There's a reason why Elon Musk is running to Trump for help after the EU started suing him for breaking this law.

https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-elon-musk-x-tech-social-media-politics-elections-eu/

If Trump can't dodge EU disinformation laws, no one can.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tweak algorithms to limit reach of new accounts, don't allow russians to buy ads or blue checkmarks, have a team of moderators that moderate based on known bad images, known bad IP addresses, known bad account creation patterns. If non-profit researchers are able to uncover botnets, there's no reason why billion dollar companies can't. It's a cat and mouse game, but it's not acceptable for these companies to put in 0 effort. These companies are better funded than the Internet Research Agency.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 117 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When have Comcast, Disney, or IBM ever have been on the wrong side of history? /s

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Technology is not the solution to a social problem. Big tech companies have an obligation to make it more difficult for state actors and extremists from multiplying obviously false claims about elections and protected minorities.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 1 day ago

The EU has already implemented a similar law making disinformation illegal.

Some platforms are also obliged to prevent the dissemination of harmful data, which does not necessarily have to be illegal content under European Union law or the national laws of European Union member states. This is, in particular, the case of online intermediaries that have obtained the status of Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) or Very Large Online Search Engine (VLOSE) because they have an average number of monthly active users in the Union of at least 45 million and have therefore been qualified as such by the European Commission.

In the light of the DSA regulations, disinformation may potentially constitute primarily two systemic risks defined in the provisions of the Digital Services Act:
a) the risk relates to an actual or foreseeable negative impact on democratic processes, civic discourse and electoral processes, as well as on public security (recital 82),
b) the risk relates to an actual or foreseeable negative effect on the protection of public health, minors and serious negative consequences to a person’s physical and mental well-being, or on gender-based violence. Such risks may also stem from coordinated disinformation campaigns related to public health, or from online interface design that may stimulate behavioural addictions of recipients of the service (recital 83).
In turn, according to Article 37 of the DSA, providers of very large online platforms and very large online search engines at their own expense are obliged to undergo independent audits at least once a year to assess their compliance with the obligations set out, inter alia, in point 7 above.

https://chambers.com/articles/the-digital-services-act-dsa-and-combating-disinformation-10-key-takeaways

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 24 points 1 day ago

End road work, start train work

 

@antonioguterres on twitter:

I condemn the broadening of the Middle East conflict with escalation after escalation.

This must stop.

We absolutely need a ceasefire.

7:26 PM · Oct 1, 2024

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20240719155854/https://www.wired.com/story/crowdstrike-outage-update-windows/

"CrowdStrike is far from the only security firm to trigger Windows crashes with a driver update. Updates to Kaspersky and even Windows’ own built-in antivirus software Windows Defender have caused similar Blue Screen of Death crashes in years past."

"'People may now demand changes in this operating model,' says Jake Williams, vice president of research and development at the cybersecurity consultancy Hunter Strategy. 'For better or worse, CrowdStrike has just shown why pushing updates without IT intervention is unsustainable.'"

 

Seems like a really serious vulnerability, any container attack or malicious image could take over a container host if there's no hardening on the containers.

 

I wanted to share an observation I've seen on the way the latest computer systems work. I swear this isn't an AI hype train post 😅

I'm seeing more and more computer systems these days use usage data or internal metrics to be able to automatically adapt how they run, and I get the feeling that this is a sort of new computing paradigm that has been enabled by the increased modularity of modern computer systems.

First off, I would classify us being in a sort of "second-generation" of computing. The first computers in the 80s and 90s were fairly basic, user programs were often written in C/Assembly, and often ran directly in ring 0 of CPUs. Leading up to the year 2000, there were a lot of advancements and technology adoption in creating more modular computers. Stuff like microkernels, MMUs, higher-level languages with memory management runtimes, and the rise of modular programming in languages like Java and Python. This allowed computer systems to become much more advanced, as the new abstractions available allowed computer programs to reuse code and be a lot more ambitious. We are well into this era now, with VMs and Docker containers taking over computer infrastructure, and modern programming depending on software packages, like you see with NPM and Cargo.

So we're still in this "modularity" era of computing, where you can reuse code and even have microservices sharing data with each other, but often the amount of data individual computer systems have access to is relatively limited.

More recently, I think we're seeing the beginning of "data-driven" computing, which uses observability and control loops to run better and self-manage.

I see a lot of recent examples of this:

  • Service orchestrators like Linux-systemd and Kubernetes that monitor the status and performance of services they own, and use that data for self-healing and to optimize how and where those services run.
  • Centralized data collection systems for microservices, which often include automated alerts and control loops. You see a lot of new systems like this, including Splunk, OpenTelemetry, and Pyroscope, as well as internal data collection systems in all of the big cloud vendors. These systems are all trying to centralize as much data as possible about how services run, not just including logs and metrics, but also more low-level data like execution-traces and CPU/RAM profiling data.
  • Hardware metrics in a lot of modern hardware. Before 2010, you were lucky if your hardware reported clock speeds and temperature for hardware components. Nowadays, it seems like hardware components are overflowing with data. Every CPU core now not only reports temperature, but also power usage. You see similar things on GPUs too, and tools like nvitop are critical for modern GPGPU operations. Nowadays, even individual RAM DIMMs report temperature data. The most impressive thing is that now CPUs even use their own internal metrics, like temperature, silicon quality, and power usage, in order to run more efficiently, like you see with AMD's CPPC system.
  • Of source, I said this wasn't an AI hype post, but I think the use of neural networks to enhance user interfaces is definitely a part of this. The way that social media uses neural networks to change what is shown to the user, the upcoming "AI search" in Windows, and the way that all this usage data is fed back into neural networks makes me think that even user-facing computer systems will start to adapt to changing conditions using data science.

I have been kind of thinking about this "trend" for a while, but this announcement that ACPI is now adding hardware health telemetry inspired me to finally write up a bit of a description of this idea.

What do people think? Have other people seen the trend for self-adapting systems like this? Is this an oversimplification on computer engineering?

 

Awful to see our personal privacy and social lives being ransomed like this. €10 seems like a price gouge for a social media site, and I'm even seeing a price tag of 150SEK (~€15) In Sweden.

view more: next ›