jonsnothere

I do think they have a point: there's not many other engines I can think of that are quite as 'tangible' as theirs. Every object has its physical place in the world and can be picked up, manipulated,... in a way that's unlike other engines where the world just feels more static.

I dab too, there are dozens of us!

We have this in Europe for new cars, and the issue everyone expects is that cars are terrible at accurately knowing the speed limit. Current cars often can already show what they think the speed limit is, but it's often inaccurate due to missing a sign or road crossing, or any other software/image recognition problems. Which means you're bound to get false positives, causing drivers to turn off the warnings each time.

The only upside is that we might get another epically long Milo Rossi debunking

That honestly seems pretty low for friend.com

Although the fact they're developing hardware on less than a million dollar budget is bananas, let alone the other whack ideas

On the other hand, those coalition talks can take months or longer with the old government continuing to run things for sometimes over a year after the elections. Looking at you, Belgium

He'd probably do something similar on day 1 while at the same time starting to recuperate the action politically, and after a few days just go into full conspiracy or similar mode

Yeah, in fact I think that's a majority of those cases. Vocal minority of reactionaries and/or fans disappointed that their expectations weren't met despite the product on its own being good

Oh, that's not even showing as a missing character, to me it just looks like 0.9

At least we agree 0.99... = 1

0.9 is most definitely not equal to 1

Not for a couple of decades he hasn't, see Spaceballs the series or crazy history of the world part 2

2,5 tons seems extremely doable for even pretty simple ships.