killernova

joined 1 year ago
[–] killernova@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You mean buried six feet under it?

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cowards? Or secretly want to follow in his footsteps, hoping they will succeed where Donald failed. And why shouldn't they? America is clearly crumbling from within, ripe for the taking - if you can take it. They're not scared, they're evil and calculating and hungry for power. It's a sickening corporate sponsered puppet show.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, gotcha. The word 'only' instead of 'just' would have made the sentence more clear. Anyway, I wish you happiness and good health!

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is why humans will never solve big problems like climate change. We can't see past our own nose and it's fucking embarrassing.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What timeline you living in?

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Definitely not. I've seen these type of questions and answers on practically any job application in America. Thing is, this isn't even the worst example of it, unfortunately. It's fucking depressing and degrading.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We can't afford it? Then we go extinct. What is the higher price? Anyway, it's probably out of our hands by now. Like I mentioned, nature will probably choose for us, and she always takes the path of least resistance.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's definitely better than nothing, I'll agree, but also underwhelming from where we need to be because it makes such little difference. Most greenhouse gasses come from factory farming and the activities of corporations. We should still make these baby steps in green technology even if it's too late to change our fate, because the science of it is or could be valuable for an easier, more comfortable, or slower extinction process - as morbid as that sounds.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Theoretically, it could make aviation almost carbon neutral due to inherent inefficiencies, but what good will that do? We need to be heavily carbon negative in order to even have a the tiniest, faintest glimmer of hope to avert our own extinction if we continue to do nothing about this problem.

Reducing consumption is the only way to achieve this but that requires either a monumental shift in human behavior, or simply less humans. And, since we seemingly aren't making the choice, I wonder which one nature will choose for us...

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully your questions have been answered by now, and now you know everyone here was right all along - to no one's surprise except you of course. Have a great life!

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Not much else to say except yes you're right. Unfortunately, the average person doesn't care or understand the difference.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Capitalism requires human sacrifice and suffering in order to function. Most economic systems do, unfortunately. Wage slavery is still slavery, but modernized. That way, we all can be slaves.

Hopefully people won't stand for this, dying in the heat because your boss said you can't have water or a break. It's just so absurd, there's no way people will accept this. I hope.

view more: next ›