lennivelkant

Ich finde, die Lesbarkeit und Klarheit sollte da gegenüber der "korrekten" Rechtschreibung Priorität haben

Nette Interaktionen sind für Weicheier, Ars-

Ich kann nicht mal den Witz durchziehen ohne mich schlecht zu fühlen. Ich finds spitze, dass dir das einen Kommentar wert war. Mit etwas Freundlichkeit geht es uns doch allen besser.

It would be Musical Roulette essentially

Maybe they just forgot to brainwash them with anti-union propaganda

Der letzte Punkt (Geld hatten wir keins, aber Haus konnten wir kaufen) geht mir so unglaublich auf den Zeiger. Hatte ich doch das "Vergnügen" mit einer ältlichen Vermieterin zu sprechen bei einer Wohnungsübergabe, die dann irgendwas geredet hat, die Wohnung hätten sie ursprünglich für ihren Sohn gekauft gehabt damals - das habe man sich ja vom Mund abgespart, ne?

Hab mir das "Soviel vom Mund absparen kann ich gar nich, dass das für eine Wohnung langt" verkniffen. Vom Kind oder zweiter Wohnung fürs Kind fang ich gar nicht erst an.

Skirmishers as in "Light Cavalry", designed to catch closing archery and ride them down? I'm not big on RTS (I suck at multitasking), but I'm always fascinated by gamified implementations of historical dynamics.

I don't suppose they also support "recruit auxiliary specialists" as option?

Announcing the new "Royal Stables" DLC: "Marauders & Massacres" is sure to spice up your medieval farm simulation!

They were also rare. To effectively pull off horse archery, you needed good horses, good riders that also happened to be good archers (both of which weren't trivial on their own, let alone combined) and good coordination. Bows are more effective the closer you are, so to get the most out of your arrows, you'll want to close in, but then you also need to wheel off again without your riders getting in each other's way, so you needed to drill maneuvers for that.

So you either need to have a sufficiently large body of soldiers with the leisure to train both archery and riding instead of working the fields, or you needed a society that treats them as basic skills anyway and only needed training in the military application. Nomadic peoples like the Scythians or Mongols often had the former, so they were notable sources of dangerous mounted archery, particularly where the raising and support of a professional army wasn't feasible. Rome had the Equites Sagitarii, but they were part of the distinct social class we would call Knights, so not your rank-and-file soldier (and those were already more professional than later levy- or retinue-based militaries).

So if we were concerned about accuracy*, these units should be expensive and require good management to make the most of them, but be very dangerous too. The point about open / closed terrain certainly fits as well.

What's a bit more foggy is how games usually handle bow effectiveness at range, but that's its own topic.

*I do care about accuracy, but not at any cost - games need to be fun too, and that's worth sacrificing some accuracy for.

I don't know the rapport you have but this is super sweet to see

Like that one time he actually managed to keep his gob shut for three consecutive minutes?

It was a dentist visit. He refused to open his mouth until offered a candy.

(This story is made up for satirical purposes.)

Actually, I do read the fluff. Not HR though, just the technical approver whether the candidate's skillset looks up to the task.

Had one candidate whose letter claimed their experience in one field would be valuable for their work with us. Indeed, they did have plenty of experience in it. If that was the field I was working in, I'd have considered them a great fit.

Unfortunately, we're a different field. Not that it would disqualify them - I'm the last person to hold a lazy copy-paste-fill template against anyone. I hate those things too. I just found that slip-up amusing.

(And I also wouldn't hold a will to switch tracks against them either. I didn't even know anything about my field four years ago, but now I love it.)

Don't throw shade on IEx now! I'd rather not spend New Year's waiting for the retort.