luchuan

joined 2 years ago
[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I really wonder what goes through the heads of people designing these awful experiences when they do so and how nihilistic you have be be in experiment review just view the world in pure metrics and sign off.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago

These people are never accountable in DNC lore. They are just failed by the people around them (that they appointed).

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 months ago

You could try framing it, maybe with a picture of your dad doing kendo or just you two together. There are places that do custom framing and will put it all together ready to hang on your wall. The sentimental additions to the case the sword ends up in should take all the edginess away.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Where did the anti fluoride panic come from? This feels like it came out of nowhere compared to watching antivax which was gaining momentum even pre-covid.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Meanwhile the pope actively stewards an entire pedophile bureaucracy. Our glorious gothic spires and their uncouth minarets.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My $racism isn't irrational, it's just that $racism

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I only ever drink cold brew as the occasional treat at a cafe. I have a moka pot at home and just have that coffee over ice. I personally found myself struggling to make it well at home.

  1. It tastes a bit less acidic or smoother than traditional coffee. You really notice the difference comparing a black cold brew to a black iced americano.

  2. You can serve it chilled or over ice. I've never heard of reheating it but if you were to try I'd suggest a low heat and to reheat slowly. You might introduce a burnt taste to it if it's under high heat.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 3 months ago

Mfw other cultures

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Imo it's whites who are afraid the computer will do to them what they do to everyone else. I've written this comment elsewhere about these "safe AI" and "AI extinction risk" freaks.

Given the mostly white, bourgeois preoccupation with “x-AI risk” (existential/extinction) I think the real “risk” is that the self-legitimating myths of capitalism will fall on muted microphones. Even 10 years ago when AI was still called machine learning and it was much less impressive (its outputs were exclusively categorization of inputs) and it required decades of breakthroughs and to be hooked up to every input in society and multiplexed with every output to do anything “harmful” the x-AI risk people were running around crying (this holds true today of LLMs and other statistically likely to exist content emitters).

The pitch is always that the AI will decide the needs of the many outweigh the needs (private property rights) of the few. This is only scary if you are among that few. Even property rights obsessed liberals don’t think themselves among the few who will be exproprAIted but are outraged by the expropriation itself. It’s a boogyman spewed by the people who are the problem and we’re asked to share their fear. Ridiculous.

Unlike other private property and artifacts of capital accumulation which are inert (the workers may organize against you but the steel mill itself won’t), the AI their capital gives birth to might in several decades time maybe organize against you (but not really).

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 4 months ago

This would be a good scam if it was believable that Musk would ever give a single penny away.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago

Holy fuck the crypto freaks got the fiatoid government to pump their bags and of course they don't see the irony.

[–] luchuan@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So happy for you! I'm glad it worked out.

 

Someone really saw all the medical gofundmes and thought that would be a great standalone business...

 
 

To the surprise of no one, these things that probabilistically generate strings of text make shit up. Sure it's biased towards previously written strings of words which are hopefully true but no reason something "correctish" can't be shit out.

 

Something something, paper tiger, Mao was right.

 

I'm shocked they're doing this given how much money institutions lost.

 

Can't even afford a house lmfao at least shill something useful

view more: next ›