[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 month ago

I know a lawyer at Roper-Greyell. The firm specializes in defending/protecting companies around employment law. They probably also consult on best practices for companies to avoid suits.

They are a law firm, but they are LMG's law firm. Note that we're reading what LMG wants to share about the report, not the report itself.

It's a legal strategy to say, "Investigators didn't find anything seriously wrong, and we're considering suing you for defamation"

A lot of the other replies to your comment read between the lines in some insightful ways. I would just like to also add that "claims of bullying and harassment were not substantiated" means that the investigation didn't find evidence. Not that the bullying/ harassment didn't occur. It is kind of meaningless without knowing what information was looked at. What sorts of substantiation could reasonably be expected from the investigation?

It's possible that the person making allegations has evidence that the investigators didn't.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 month ago

I was taught in boy scouts that an upside down flag is a symbol to request help.

It actually is a good symbol to represent the state of America. Just not for the reasons they think

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 months ago

I have a colleague that has a wife from the Philippines. They live in Canada but are building a house there. He said I should come visit, and I replied something about how my wife would love a tropical vacation. He replied:

Bringing your wife on vacation to the Philippines is like bringing a lunchbag to a restaurant.

... ... ... cool.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 months ago

Hey I love this meme everytime I see it, but I want to point out that that point about growing up in "similar circumstances that nurture their skill' is contingent upon working musicians being able to afford to raise children. Children that will also need to work.

Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think there is a comparable proportion of the population that are working musicians, that earn enough money to support children, but not so much that the children don't have to learn a trade, as there were in "Enlightenment" Europe where if a person wanted to hear music they had to make it themselves, or pay someone to make it, and every rich asshole had a chamber orchestra following him around.

Also parents don't teach children their trades the way they used to, and they aren't expected to support their parent's businesses the way they used to. (I'm not lamenting this). There used to be a lot of pressure on children to contribute economically. Mozart, and his siblings probably faced what we'd consider child abuse if he didn't practice. He was certainly exploited.

Michael Jackson is a Mozart of the 20th century. He was put to work at a young age to support his parents and siblings, that were also working musicians.

As much as I love Weird Al (and I do) I don't think he was groomed and exploited the same way MJ/WM were. Kudos to his parents for that I guess.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 54 points 4 months ago

I think it's more likely a way to get a portion of your employees to resign without having to deal with the socio-econo-political headache of layoffs or give severance packages.

It doesn't boost productivity, but it may cut payroll.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 47 points 5 months ago

I think having the FBI arrest the leadership is a better approach than troops killing each other.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 76 points 5 months ago

Another way of thinking about it is betting your entire bankroll for 99.9....% certainty that you will win $1.

Say you go into the casino with $1000.

Bet:

$1 lose.
$3 lose.
$9 lose.
$27 lose.
$81 lose.
$243 lose.
$729 oh wait you can't bet that much, you only have $457 left. Dang, do you bet $457 or find another $272? 

Bet $457 and you win $914! Congrats you're now only down $86!
Or maybe you lost and are down $1000.

Or maybe you scrounged up $272 so you could keep playing
Bet 729 and lose. Now you're down $1272.
Or
Bet 729 and you win 1458. Pay back the $272 you borrowed from your buddy, you're still up $186. 
You just bet $729 dollars for a %50 chance of winning $186.

But what are the chances of getting 6 or 7 losses in a row? 1 in 64, or 128 respectively, actually worse because roulette wheels aren't 50/50, they're 18/19 (18 wins and 19 losses in 37 plays on average) or worse. So losing 6 times in a row will happen 1 in 54 plays, 7 losses is 1 in 106.

Google says roulette wheels spin 55 times per hour so with your strategy you will lose your bank roll in about one hour assuming your starting bet is 0.1% of your bank roll.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 40 points 7 months ago

You know what's the real bullshit? Listing melted butter as an ingredient. Mother fucker, who keeps melted butter on hand? Make the ingredient oil, or make melting it part of the instructions!

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 40 points 8 months ago

I was at Thanksgiving dinner Sunday night:

I was a substitute teacher too maybe I should be prime Minister....

at least we're all gender fluid now!

I'm sick of him spending so much money

you got quiet anon what's the matter? What do you think?

I stopped liking him when he backtracked on electoral reform as soon as elected. But I was not at all interested in agreeing with them. I just said I literally didn't know what they were talking about and went into the other room.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 49 points 9 months ago
[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago

I was sure this was going to end with

tfw I'm a kitchen table

Or something

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 48 points 11 months ago

In English the correct way to pronounce something is the way that will most reliably communicate to your intended audience without ambiguity or distraction.

Since my intention is usually to convey my superior knowledge of trivia and/or to stir shit up, I pronounce it with a soft g.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

m0darn

joined 1 year ago