m_f

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Permanent URL: https://mezzacotta.net/garfield/?comic=468

Strip by: DanielBT

SFX: slorp, slurp, slup, slurp {Garfield sloppily eats from his bowl}

Jon: Please, Garfield, there's nothing more disgusting than that!

SFX: slorp, slup!

{Garfield looks up and has the head of Bill the Cat.}

Jon: Except that.

The author writes:

I'm surprised no one's tried this obvious mash-up before. Maybe because it was too obvious? Bill comes from that strange realm known as Ugly Cute, where even Slimer was popular even when he was absolutely disgusting. Bill the Cat is just really a combination of Garfield and Odie. Think about it.

Original strip: 2001-03-05.

 

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/sex

Alt textSurely there's a LITTLE degradation? Maybe on weekends or Halloween?

Bonus panelBonus panel

 

Confused about what this strip is? See the first post here

 

🔗

Caption:

“And the really great thing about this jungle of ours is that any one of you could grow up to be King of the Apes.”

No alt text

Disqus comments

Archived Page

 

🔗

Caption:

Famous patrons of Chez Rotting Carcass

Alt text:

I loved the food! / Delicious / My favorite carrion. Ely / The best! BG / I eat here all the time.

Disqus comments

Archived Page

 

🔗

Caption:

Clown therapy sessions

Alt text:

Gee, am I the only one here who's laughing on the outside and the inside?

Disqus comments

Archived Page

 

🔗

No caption

Alt text:

That does it.... I'm gonna steer.

Disqus comments

Archived Page

 

🔗

Caption:

“The big fellah’s gonna be A-OK, Mrs. Dickerson. Now a square knot would’ve been bad news, but this just appears to be a ‘granny.’”

Alt text:

F.E. MEYER VETERINARY MEDICINE

Disqus comments

Archived Page

 
27
2025-07-11 (discuss.online)
 
20
1980-07-11 (discuss.online)
 

🔗

Transcript:

SLURP! SLURP!

Garfield: I think I strained something.

 
[–] m_f@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago

In a similar spirit, the Juicy Lucy was invented in MN, though two different bars claim to be the ones that invented it.

A Jucy Lucy (or Juicy Lucy) is a stuffed cheeseburger with the cheese inside of the meat instead of on top, resulting in a melted core of cheese. It is a popular, regional cuisine in Minnesota, particularly in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Two bars in Minneapolis claim to have invented the burger, while other local bars and restaurants have created their own interpretations of the style.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What makes it special? Is there a particular dish/sauce that's made with it that you like?

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

I saw a comment elsewhere that found a way to make the hallucinations useful:

I've found this to be one of the most useful ways to use (at least) GPT-4 for programming. Instead of telling it how an API works, I make it guess, maybe starting with some example code to which a feature needs to be added. Sometimes it comes up with a better approach than I had thought of. Then I change the API so that its code works.

Conversely, I sometimes present it with some existing code and ask it what it does. If it gets it wrong, that's a good sign my API is confusing, and how.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 6 points 2 days ago

Robot Chicken did a spoof of the PSA a while back:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVz2oXqlmbg

[–] m_f@discuss.online 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The human is happy that they're special, but then find out that they're simply used as a tool because of that. There's an extra sting because humans aren't being used for something cool and exciting, they're just brains in a vat calculating waste management routing.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That looks like the perfect hangover food lol

[–] m_f@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've had similar food before, but never exactly that, looks good! The history is interesting, being invented for coal miners is a very WV.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The metaphor of “stochastic parrots” has become a rallying cry for those who seek to preserve the sanctity of human cognition against the encroachment of large language models. In this paper, we extend this metaphor to its logical conclusion: if language models are stochastic parrots, and humans learned language through statistical exposure to linguistic data, then humans too must be stochastic parrots. Through careful argumentation, we demonstrate why this is impossible—humans possess the mystical quality of “true understanding” while machines possess only “pseudo-understanding.” We introduce the Recursive Parrot Paradox (RPP), which states that any entity capable of recognizing stochastic parrots cannot itself be a stochastic parrot, unless it is, in which case it isn’t. Our analysis reveals that emergent abilities in language models are merely “pseudo-emergent,” unlike human abilities which are “authentically emergent” due to our possession of what we term “ontological privilege.” We conclude that no matter how persuasive, creative, or capable language models become, they remain sophisticated pattern matchers, while humans remain sophisticated pattern matchers with souls

The paper is tongue-in-cheek, but gets to an important point. Anyone saying "But LLMs are just ..." has to explain why that "..." doesn't also apply to humans. IMO a lot of people throwing around "stochastic parrots!" just want humans to be special, and work backwards from there.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The deli version of kintsugi

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

It's easy to harrumph at this article if you hate AI and all that, but I think it's interesting to try to come up with a somewhat objective definition of creativity. I do think it gets at an important part of the creative process, "Necessity is the mother of all invention". When you're working locally and stuff starts getting weird because of nonlocal constraints, then you have to start getting creative to make it all work coherently as best you can.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

lemm.ee going down is a huge loss for Lemmy, but welcome! Hopefully we'll be a good replacment for it

[–] m_f@discuss.online 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Do we know what this one's name is?

EDIT: To answer my own question, it appears not. Swedish text here says in English:

Sofus is a small black animal that accompanies Moomin and helps and to some extent imitates him in some of Tove Jansson's episodes of the series, something that is reflected in his English name Shadow, which means "shadow". In the first episode, it is Sofu's cousin who has this role, but the cousin then does not have time to be in the series anymore and hands over to Sofus at the beginning of the second episode. The name of Sofu's cousin is never mentioned in the series

view more: next ›