madejackson

Well, technically speaking, she is just using her right for free speech... Not in a very smart way though.

Authelia is an authentification provider. So you can have a single login for all your services. It can provide autorisation and authentification with a single unified login.

Bitwarden is much "simpler", in it's just a passwordmanager. As soon as you start sharing passwords, like you do in bitwarden, you lose the authentification part, even worse, you lose control over the shared login. Anyone with autorisation can "steal" the login as in unauthorized copying/distributing the password or even changing the password alltogether.

With an sso like authelia you can mitigate such attack vectors.

Quick heads up, Nextcloud works perfectly fine behind an auth provider. I am using it behind authentik.

Imposter syndrome is real

Yep :) I used leftover pieces, so the length was fixed. But it worked out exactly fo my needs :).

I didn't get notification but i cannot let stand your statement. You're just wrong. Pretty much all of scientists agree that it is unimaginably worse than good. Trying to argue about that is just yourself coping with denying the issue at hand.

Blaming bad usability/lack of features on the user is just what it: a bad excuse.

For completeness, we cannot say for sure if we even exist. The universe could very well just be an imagination and nothing really matters, including the laws of physics and our understanding of magnets.

disclaimer: opinion here ofc deciding if it is bad depends very much on the viewpoint. But yourself as a human should probably view it from the viewpoint of mankind in general. And then, yes, it is undoubtably bad. It is going to cost humankind an unimaginable amount of money and it'll increase inequality and unfairness in unimaginable amounts. That's also why there are so many people denying or not believing it. A lot of humans are uninformed or unable to grasp the issue on a logical level simply because of the scale of the issue.

Swiss here, Blick is known for low quality news. This "news" is only a claim from some unknown party. Very likely inaccurate or even plain wrong.

Also, it doesn't feature a serial port. This phone is almost useless. /s

Are you serious? Instead of doubling down on your ignorancy by asking rhetorical questions you could also try to inform yourself. The answer to your question is in OP's post:

The children in these photos/videos can’t make pornography, they’re sexually abused into making this material. CP insinuates that it’s legitimate porn with children. CSAM, on the other hand, calls it what it is: sexual abuse of children.