The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.
But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.
My brain skipped as I read Brennan and tabletop in the same sentence and jumped to Dropout/Dimension 20.
Even the phrase "improving the situation in Gaza" can be ambiguous.
Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.
Get an S/MIME certificate and send from an S/MIME compatible email client.
They're kinda addressable in that the electron beam scans across a line, and every through each line, with a pulse activating the (iirc phosphor) at the pixel for the desired colour.
I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.
Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.
When does a colloquial term become a non-colloquial? Usage by government/official contexts?
In August 2022, Minister of Immigration Michael Wood referred to 85,000 holders of recently approved New Zealand 2021 resident visas as "new Kiwis".
New Zealand -> Kiwi.
Human languages: the words are made up and the rules don't matter.
Especially true for English.
If it wasn't for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.
You're at a good age to do backpacking travel. Go explore the world.