their mistake, as usual, is not grokking that genuine human interactions might be ritualised, but are not rituals.
mawhrin
bringing one in context of another, when they're not related at all. also, i distrust pale vegans (who almost never realise the impact of pale veganism on other places).
(whispering, wheezing) kill me father, for i have read the comments
some of the content I've found most inspirational comes from high status people (the Dalai Lama, Sam Harris, etc)
not at all. but then i'm aggressively middle-aged, and have a mortgage.
you seem to be mistaking this sub for a debate club; have a very adequate life.
“make a case for ethical cryptocurrency investment then, would you kindly?”
ah. do make a case for ethical cryptocurreny investment then, would you kindly?
note, i'm talking cryptocurrencies, not cryptography.
so, you're a pale vegan doing crypto and investing in ai because other people eat meat?
actively investing in shell and actively investing in crypto is unethical and it's not wrong to point it out, and neither is this moral panic; if you don't want to be subjected to ethical assessment, don't brag about potentially unethical behaviour.
shrug i'm not a karnista, i'm not even a lawyer.