nickhammes

joined 2 years ago
[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

What are the cool and interesting tools in stone masonry?

I know a reasonable amount about metal and wood working tools, so I imagine CNC cutting and engraving have added some interesting new options, but I really have no other guesses

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In the 90s, a lot of programmers spent a lot of time carefully optimizing everything, on the theory that every CPU cycle counted. And in the decades since, it's gotten easier than ever to write software, but the craft of writing great software has stalled compared to the ease of writing mediocre software. "Why shouldn't we block on a call to a remote service? Computers are so fast these days"

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There are like 3 different routes that make sense for me to get home from work, depending on where there's traffic

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some games also use the rarity system to funnel mechanically simpler cards into more common rarities, which works well in a draft environment, since those are often the cards you want to have come up more. Which is really the point of the system, ideally it would be a system to support draft environments that work well, without artificial scarcity that hurts constructed players.

But you can also make a constructed format that only allows "simpler" cards that have been printed at common, which is neat. Or one that only allows higher rarities.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Facial recognition technology being used for surveillance is awful, I agree, but I don't think that's what's happening here? It seems like they're just pointing a camera at fireworks, and identifying the property they came from.

Cops with camera drones are also a problem, but it's not like they'd need anything special you can't already get off the shelf to do this.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

the curing process introduces carcinogenic nitrates, which is a similar risk factor, if I understand correctly

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

If you're going to say anything other than unconditionally legal, you need some really clear legal definitions on something, but you certainly can. Like you could define viability as if you delivered it on the spot, you'd have a fully-formed baby with lungs that are ready to breathe, and otherwise unlikely to need life support. You could define the first 6 months of pregnancy as inviable.

You could define the burden of proof in a way that protects doctors, maybe someone trying to already wrongdoing needs to prove that no reasonable physician would agree with their judgement. You could even limit who has standing to take legal action, because some random person on the street isn't party to it at all.

I'm not saying that "if the doctor and pregnant person agree, it's legal" is bad, but there are certainly other reasonable options, that I think would play out similarly in practice. Like I'm assuming a doctor about to deliver a baby wouldn't likely entertain a request for an abortion instead, nor would they likely get one.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The field of artificial intelligence has also made incredible strides in the last decade, and the decade before that. The field of artificial general intelligence has been around for something like 70 years, and has made a really modest amount of progress in that time, on the scale of what they're trying to do.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Watching the commentary would be hilarious.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Not only were there 6 mirror matches in the bracket, prearranging the finals matchup, but plenty of people showed up with decks that weren't red, and some even had favorable matchups against one of these archetypes.

Yet somehow, wotc will look at this and make a ban announcement next week like "We hear you; sheoldred the apocalypse is banned from standard, but we're watching cori steel cutter closely"

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Agreeing with this, expanding a RAID array is not necessarily impossible, with something like RAID 5, and the right RAID setup, you could theoretically add an identical disk without wiping it all in the rebuild. RAID 1, you'll 100% need to copy the data somewhere that isn't the 2/4 disks in the meantime. In an environment where storage is expensive, RAID 1 is not suitable imo.

ZFS makes it so easy though. Throw a mismatched disk in? No big deal, it's in your pool now. Want double parity for extra peace of mind? You can do that. It self-heals so you don't need fsck, its maximum limits are too big to realistically matter on human scales, and the documentation on it is pretty good.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

At this point, they certainly shouldn't be counting on it

view more: next ›