ninjan

So much dumb shit has been done under the banner of NFT that I want to disagree but yes, if each ID in your blockchain represents a unique variant of an item, and we want to that to persist then yes NFT would fit the bill as a correct term for it.

NFTs don't need to be limited, they don't need to have transaction fees to move them, they don't need to contain a link to an image and masquerade as if you own that image. All they need to do is prove that you have control of it by virtue of it being in your care. Then that proof confers the ability to use the item it represents in game. For currency you naturally wouldn't use NFTs, though you could if you're adamant you want a more "cash like" experience with change back and all that jazz.

I'll add to the group saying things got better by 30. In my case having kids has helped me get my shit together and take better care of myself both physically and mentally.

... I agree it's great but it's exactly what is criticized here. It's the typical bombastic movie epic theme song. It would fit just as well into any Sci-Fi block buster. There is nothing about it that gives away that it's for a game as opposed to a movie or tv-series.

He's such a shit stirrer, the first guy to start chanting "fight fight fight" when ever two people start arguing in public.

No the joke is that this is that sassy but supporting friend saying it. It's a reality check and an opportunity to ask for help from the friend saying it.

Huh, fascinating stuff. Wonder what triggers it

??? Frogs breed super quick and aren't that tricky to breed in captivity? I'd even go so far and say that frog meat should be rather sustainable since they eat insects which we can also breed effectively and they in turn can eat refuse from farming. I also haven't ever seen or heard about the frog being of a particular breed or "wild caught" being part of the allure, nor seen it mentioned in a menu. This whole thing is absurd.

Probably the only type of destruction of art as protest I condone. The piece:

1. Is not very old or culturally/historically important
2. Directly depicts someone at the root of this conflict
3. Was deliberately targeted and the reasons layed out

Trying to destroy unrelated art work is just wasteful of our shared human heritage. Attacking symbols of oppression however is perfectly valid in my opinion and is to me perfectly reasonable escalation when peaceful protests obviously do not bring the changes needed.

I put this on the same level as African Americans attacking statues of confederate generals and other proponents of slavery to hammer home their point.

I wonder if you can make it "green wash" which is forbidden under EU law... Though what I can see the "feature" doesn't seem available where I'm at. Likely because the risk it will do something illegal is too great.

So in a roundabout way the Butler did it? Sounds like a cliche whodunnit...

Works pretty well in Chrome in my experience. At least on iPad.

EDIT: though to be fair I mainly use it to cast.