null

joined 1 month ago
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -5 points 5 days ago (13 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (10 children)

If you want to pretend there wasn't a huge base of people here telling others that they are genocide supporters if they vote for Kamala, that's on you.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago

Why do those take you hours to install on Linux and no time on Windows?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

You're welcome to your whacky opinion. Just pointing out that it's uniquely yours 🙂

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -3 points 5 days ago (19 children)

I mean, he has some questionable opinions and past behaviour, but level of research is just about the weirdest thing to criticize him for...

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 6 points 5 days ago

That's mostly an issue with dogs. Cats hunt for play and don't get as distressed if they don't end up with a final "catch".

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Wikipedia strongly disagrees with your definition

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What niche stuff are you manually installing that somehow takes hours on Linux, and is instant and easy on Windows?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago (12 children)

You picked up an argument against people who pushed against voting for Kamala. If you're defending a position you don't hold, that's on you.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 6 days ago (14 children)

You’re standing there, telling your neighbor “at least I didn’t pick a child killer!”

The part where you abstained from helping your neighbor, and the 9 additional children, etc.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 6 days ago

What's the theory?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Is it possible for those needs to be met systematically without some kind of coercion?

view more: ‹ prev next ›