obbeel

joined 11 months ago
[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

ChatGPT is worse. The others not so much.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 month ago

In a culture where people just want to make the cut, chatbots are really perfect.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago

I think owning a platform like GitHub and acting like you can profit out of your code (not your product) isn't good news.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 2 months ago

This would fit "A Boring Dystopia" well. I think protecting data isn't the way to go. The effects of it can already be seen:

All the burocracy for common people, no burocracy at all for Big Tech. No IP, no robots.txt. They are trusted and can do whatever they like, starting on your phone. It honestly looks like another form of aristocracy.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 2 months ago

I think many people wouldn't like to live under a "Nerd Reich", so it's only natural that there is a mainstream article against that. I'm assuming people who don't understand anything about the technology that keeps their attention most of the time are concerned about the possibility. Society losing grip over itself, that is, language (social skills) not being the primary characteristic of the successful anymore. That is a blow conventional people won't take easily.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 months ago

Awesome discussion.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 months ago

People not accepting that other people got a easier time doing certain things than others is certainly a problem, but too much blaming isn't good as well.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter if they're nerds or not. What matters is where society is swaying to.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 months ago

I've just finished reading "A Hacker Manifesto" by McKenzie Wark. I recommend that as well.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 months ago

What wouldn't I be able to access without compatibility investments? Spotify, LinkedIn? I think I'm fine.

Besides, what's the point of OSS that is owned 85% by a big company?

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 months ago
[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 months ago
 

Today I had to downgrade fastapi from 0.114.0 to 0.112.4 to make a software work. And it just hit me - what if pip didn't support 0.112.4 anymore? We would lose a good piece of software just because of that.

Of course, we can "freeze" the packages into an executable that will run for as long as the OS supports it. Which is a lot longer. But the executable is closed source. We can't see the code that is run from an executable.

Therefore, there is a need for an alternative to which we still have access to the packages even after the program is built. That would make it safely unnecessary for pip to store all versions of all packages forever more.

Any ideas?

 

Last week I posted about the magic qualities of quantum systems in Computer Science. Now I bring an example article that makes use of it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›