paintbucketholder

joined 1 year ago
[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The numbers were reported by Hamas. The UN merely used those numbers.

Tell me why we should put blind faith into anything published by Hamas?

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I can’t see a business reason why Apple would degrade image sending purposefully- it would drive its own users to get third party apps.

Depends on what the majority of people are using.

In markets where iPhone users are not in the majority, that's exactly what's happening: iPhone users are switching to third party apps.

If iPhones users are in the majority, though, then people will just default to iMessage, and non-Apple phones get associated with poor messaging quality. Which creates social pressure for non-iPhone users to buy an iPhone.

So it makes perfect business sense for Apple to degrade the messaging quality when a non-Apple phone joins the conversation.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Must eradicate it.

For the safety and security of our users!

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Not all iMessage features can be mapped to RCS, so unless Apple brings iMessage to other platforms, non-Apple phones will always be associated with an inferior messaging experience.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Because the IDF reported those numbers, and if the IDF reports those numbers, that means you were right?

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Is it intentionally hostile on Apple’s part to bar androids from joining? Yes. But the reactions from Apple users aren’t entirely unjustified

The reaction from Apple users is to blame Android users - which is entirely unjustified.

But of course, post purchase rationalization and brand loyalty play a big part in why people want to externalize blame rather than questioning their own decision or blaming their favorite company for providing a shitty cross-platform messaging experience.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

You mean we should believe the numbers when the IDF is reporting them?

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Beeper already deregistered the numbers, but it takes 24 to 36 hours for Apple servers to forget the deregistered numbers.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The two things go hand in hand, though.

Degraded messaging gets branded with green bubbles. Green bubbles - i.e. non-Apple phones - get associated with degraded messaging. Non-Apple phones get pidgeon-holed as crappy phones for messaging. People get bullied into buying iPhones.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's like flipping over the ad pages in a magazine. It's like taking the advertisement brochures out of a newspaper and throwing them into the trash. It's like leaving the room during halftime break. It's like taping a show without the commercial breaks. It's like walking past a poster without reading it. It's like getting your letters from the mailbox and throwing away the advertising mailers. It's like going to the cinema and talking during the ads that are playing before the movie. It's like walking down the sidewalk and ignoring the people trying to sell you merchandise. It's like switching channels when commercials come on.

But for some reason, people are trying to tell me that I'm ethically and morally in the wrong for blocking fucking YouTube ads.

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

These must be those death panels Republicans warned us of when the Affordable Care Act passed.....

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (6 children)

It really depends on what a Trump reign will look like, right?

Will he be able to round up tens of millions of people and deport them, as he has promised? Will he institute another Muslim ban, as he has promised? Will he stay in office after his next four year term, as he has said he wants to? Will he use the office of the president to persecute political opponents, as he has promised? Will he "root out" all the "vermin" in the United States, as he had promised? And if yes: who will get declared to be "vermin?" How will they be "rooted out?" Will he make torture legal, as he promised? Will he bring back family separation and child detention camps? Will he threaten nuclear war again? And if yes, will some crazy regime take him up on the offer?

And if all of that or even just a fraction of that comes to pass, will you still sleep well, knowing that you might have been able to stop all of that but voting for the lesser of two evils was just beneath you?

Because ultimately, that's the decision you're making.

view more: next ›