putoelquelolea

joined 2 years ago
[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

In theory, sure. In practice, are we really going to find a series of ten thousand ones? I would also like to hear more opinions from smart people

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

My guess would be that - depending on the number of digits you are looking for in the sequence - you could calculate the probability of finding any given group of those digits.

For example, there is a 100% probability of finding any group of two, three or four digits, but that probability decreases as you approach one hundred thousand digits.

Of course, the difficulty in proving this hypothesis rests on the computing power needed to prove it empirically and the number of digits of Pi available. That is, a million digits of Pi is a small number if you are looking for a ten thousand digit sequence

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I like big butts and I cannot lie

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

All that saying means is that some people are willing to change their moral compass according to situational convenience

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I want my two dollars!

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

One of the versions I have heard about this analogy comes from corn silk. The corn fed to pigs is usually of the lowest quality, and if you use the silk from cheap ears of corn, you won't be able to make a useful purse out of it

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Welcome to Muphry's Law!

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't look for snake tits

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What I actually said was that these are two different ways Google suppresses content based on its own interests.

So do you have any evidence that Google is employing the second way in this case?

And Mondragon and Huawei control Google and nakedcapitalism? That is news!

And you already promised in two previous comments to end our exchange, so I hope you take it seriously this time. No wonder Johnny doesn't want to play with you. Don't even bother asking his mom about it

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course, it's possible that Google has paired its withdrawal of advertisements with a lower rating in search results. Do you have any evidence of that happening, or is it pure supposition, like your hypothetical socialist cooperatives?

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Google is not restricting anyone's access to the internet, nor is it stopping nakedcapitalism from publishing its articles. It is simply deciding not to advertise on their website, which is a normal business decision that could have been made by a socialist cooperative or any other entity.

It sounds like your issue is with SOciEtY and oUr FoRm of gOvERnmEnT, with a little bit of BUt pEoPLe cAn'T UsE thE INteRNet WiTHoUt gOOgLe sprinkled in, rather than the actions of one company or another. Maybe you should be angry with nakedcapitalism too. They aren't a socialist cooperative either

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

In a world where Google is a cooperative representing a certian group of proletarians, and nakedcapitalism is a cooperative representing another group of proletarians, would you force them to do business together if one of them were opposed to the idea?

view more: next ›