So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time.
qfe0
joined 1 year ago
A lot of things need to happen fast to reduce the impacts of climate change. Amongst them it's gaining the knowledge of how to do all of the things that will need doing sooner or later. Lots of ideas will fail for various reasons. The more tools we work on the better off we'll be.
The other thing is it really coming at the expense of other decarbonization efforts? Or is it happening in parallel with other things.
It doesn't stop the other work well need to do, and I'm not convinced it's a net negative. I think there's room to experiment at this scale and make adjustments as we progress. Hydrogen for instance is its own can of worms and it's not clear it's the best solution, but maybe it will be. We should work on it.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
What's in there could only make you sick.
It wasn't collectively known that software was hard to do right at that time. If it always performed as intended it would have made for a less expensive and perfectly safe machine. It's the textbook case in doing software wrong because there wasn't one that happened before it.
For the love of everything, at least let's stop decommissioning serviceable nuclear plants.
Don't worry if you miss it though. A super blue moon doesn't look any different than any other supermoon and there are usually three per year.
Adjusting prices wouldn't have gotten you more trucks, would it? Ostensibly you'd still have just as many people that couldn't get a truck or had to travel. There was a spike in demand that wasn't being met.
Rito
They don't. You're a shark now.
Dress the slide not for the ride.