stagnation
Why do you see feeding and housing everyone as stagnation?
The people who are motivated by advancing technology, aren’t motivated to overcome corruption, incline equality, to replace economic systems, etc.
That seems a bit presumptuous. Why do you think people who are motivated to advance technology aren't motivated to overcome corruption, etc.?
All you’d be doing is stifling innovation, improvement, a reason for hope in the future
I disagree. I don't see why focussing on feeding and housing people implies stifling innovation. And do you not see feeding and housing everyone to be an improvement and a reason for hope in the future?
would like to present to you a technique that was co-developed with the help of other so-called experiencers
I'm much less interested in the technique itself than I am in how it was developed.
In fact, recently speaking with ChatGTP
I stopped reading there.
https://www.fastcompany.com/91344759/reddit-moderators-banning-users-chatbot-fueled-delusions
This whole thing reeks of ego and delusions. It seems to be all about you.
LOL you're gaslighting me. I just said I can't see what they're throwing at and you responded by telling me I can clearly see what they're throwing at.
I'll repeat myself: I cannot see what they're throwing the fire at.
have the right is a reason to hit someone
Why is having a right to hit someone a reason to hit them? I have the right to smash my own hand to pulp with a hammer but the fact that I have that right isn't a reason for me to do it.
Now they should have given him a chance to walk away again but that isn't a requirement. They can keep hitting him till he leaves.
So you're saying the police have the right to hit whoever they like for as long as they like, all they have to do is prevent them from leaving the area? That's crazy.
In the first second, someone tries to throw burning gasoline on a horse.
I don't see where that's happening. All I see is a line of fire appearing underneath some trees' canopy. I can see neither who throws it, how, nor what they're throwing it at; the canopy obscures everything.
Are you claiming you can see what they're throwing it at? If so, could you take a screenshot and highlight the target?
Oh the irony that this is now homed on a UK server.
They hit him because he’s behind the line.
I don't understand what line you're referring to.
By law they can use force to compel him to move.
But he got up and started to move and then yet another police officer forcefully pulled him back on to the ground. What you're saying doesn't make sense.
In layman’s terms, they can hit you until you leave the area.
Having the right to hit someone isn't a reason to hit someone. The police officer who hit the citizen with a long stick had no apparent reason to hit him.
Because politics has become entertainment. Starmer is boring, Farage is entertaining.
Could you provide any sources to back up anything you've said here?
I didn't see anyone trying to set fire to horses in this video. I did see a police horse trample a defenceless citizen who was clearly and justifiably frightened and displaying no threatening behaviour and subsequently a police officer hit the same non-threatening citizen with a long stick for no apparent reason.
No.
I asked you to show me where and you gaslighted me in response.