- backups, non-incremental ones
- prevent others from viewing information that may be sensitive
- encrypted files and directories will then be copied over to external drives and third-party servers
sapporo
joined 11 months ago
"I don’t want to encypt them in-place because I’ll be uploading them onto a server, copying them on an external drive."
I don't want to encypt them in-place because I'll be uploading them onto a server, copying them on an external drive.
that's why you should be logged out of Google and also delete your cookies periodically :) To reset the memory of Google
Nothing. But mentioning it, don't forget to mention Youtube as well.
As if Youtube didn't promote conspiracy theories and almost Nazi rhetorics that serve the country it's based in. They do, which they don't call as such. Everything else they'll call conspiracy theories and propaganda.
the fact that you like it doesn't make best or even decent in terms of privacy
. Some of them could also be implemented with native messaging.
Some? Or all?
uBlockOrigin would still loose some of its features and capabilities nonetheless, even if a sub-set of them could be implemented in other ways. Not?
Not in the direct war - correct. But in a proxy one. But even in it we haven't been to even match Russia's weapon production and which we have also admitted. By the margin of 3-7 times.
But that's about weapons. What about economy? Geopolitics? No major blow-ups for Russia, if not the opposite, either.
It's got CLI too - alright. But is it any de-facto, mature, well-known, widely used? What gurantees that it's as secure as openssl or gpg? It might have plenty of bugs and vulnerabilies.