silence7

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

President Trump’s efforts to freeze climate spending have sparked warnings of rippling consequences in years ahead. For many climate scientists, the consequences are already here.

Access options:

 

President Trump’s efforts to freeze climate spending have sparked warnings of rippling consequences in years ahead. For many climate scientists, the consequences are already here.

Access options:

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24301124

Even in places, like Central Texas, with a long history of floods, human-caused warming is creating the conditions for more frequent and severe deluges.

 

Even in places, like Central Texas, with a long history of floods, human-caused warming is creating the conditions for more frequent and severe deluges.

 

Even in places, like Central Texas, with a long history of floods, human-caused warming is creating the conditions for more frequent and severe deluges.

 

After the Supreme Court ruled that the deportations could move forward, a last-ditch attempt to block them with a new lawsuit faltered.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago

Yes, but the city officials had their boss replaced by state with one who had a mandate to cut spending. Wikipedia does a better job of getting that part right:

In April 2014, during a financial crisis, state-appointed emergency manager Darnell Earley changed Flint's water source from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (sourced from Lake Huron and the Detroit River) to the Flint River.[7] Residents complained about the taste, smell, and appearance of the water. Officials failed to apply corrosion inhibitors to the water, which resulted in lead from aging pipes leaching into the water supply, exposing around 100,000 residents to elevated lead levels.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The problem started in 2014, when a state-appointed administrator took over and stopped measures which had been used to limit corrosion, sharply increasing peoples' exposure to lead from the old pipes.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago

Be nice if she had made the flip before voting for the bill instead of after

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Only enough to get 3 out of 53 Republican Senators to vote against it. That's a few percent. Not enough to stop it, which is what matters

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

They never really cared about that. The modern anti-abortion movement was dreamed up after pro-segregation churches lost that battle and needed something else to fixate on.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're not doing anything like dismantling the telescopes; just stopping a tiny instrument that is mounted near them from being used.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The idea is to force people to pay for private forecasts

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 days ago

Im taking this down because its misinfo.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

If this bill passes in its current form, yes

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 17 points 6 days ago

Because most of it would show up as having been written by corporate lobbyists

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago

They are trying change things, but there's a good chance basic stuff like measuring CO2 concentrations would continue normally with a nonzero budget

view more: ‹ prev next ›