Yeah, WSJ gift links have a view count cap. Hence the archive link above. I'll edit with a fresh gift link, but it'll likely run out too.
The problem is that if you're downwind of plants or people or industry, you get a local CO2 concentration that can be quite different from that in well-mixed parts of the atmosphere
In general, the problem with that narrative is that Trump was openly promising to act in ways which were guaranteed (and in fact have) raise prices and take away healthcare from people, while transferring money from the pockets of the less wealthy into those of billionaires. The US also had a better economic recovery than most other developed nations.
While it is in fact important to run government in ways which help people, a lot of what was going on was using economic concerns as a socially acceptable excuse for racism.
You need watershed-level forecasts for flash floods, like a list of huc12s that will be impacted
No. But its important to make the improvement in cost and peoples lives that can come with well-done decarbonization tangible for people
The point of the false accusations was to normalize malicious prosecution and create Republican support for doing it.
Her definition — making electricity cheap by taking advantage of the way wind and solar are now cheaper than fossil fuels, doesn't seem like "further left"
We're going to need to hold power first — and that likely means a meaningful restructuring of the US government.
People being threatened while experiencing some sort of mental health crisis don't do that. Cops need to not just shout orders and threaten people, but actively deescalate to prevent unnecessary shootings.
There is a long history of most police killings being situations where officers could have deescalated but chose to shoot, or being mistaken about the presence of a gun other than their own.
The plan has always been to deport huge numbers of US citizens who aren't white enough for Vance & Miller
When Trump signed the letter, all hurricanes had womens' names