No, I'm saying that it isn't possible significantly shift peoples' diets to olive oil from other fats and oils because olive oil consumption is supply-constrained.
The drunk-at-work problem had a lot more witnesses
It's more that having some idea of what they're going to go after first and how they're going go do so makes it easier to be ready to fight back
Historic low (since 1975 when records were first kept) in terms of emissions per mile, for motor vehicles sold in the US in model year 2023.
We can't take the risk to zero — but we can reduce it pretty sharply. And that would be a big deal.
Olive oil doesn't scale to match anything near current human consumption — a big chunk of what's sold as olive oil is already counterfeit.
They're comparing actual exposure to estimated risk at that exposure. So no, we're not doing nearly enough to limit exposure, which is the whole point.
Yes, worldwide emissions are still rising — largely because of emissions growth outside the US.
And no, it's not a result of "dodgy accounting" — it's because of how electrical generation has changed, with a sharp drop in the use of coal.
There are a lot of options for dealing with that, including the possibility of burying bodies for a century or three, and subsequently moving any bones to an ossuary.
There's a deep human need to engage in death-related rituals, and burial is one that's been around for a very very long time. I do not expect to end the use of burial.
Yeah, inland areas transition to a thermokarst landscape, while places next to the ocean can just disappear entirely.
His actual statement: