is he going to explain mortage-backed securities to us plebs?
smokebuddy
joined 8 months ago
Yeah, the implication was that if anyone actually made substantial progress in reducing prices that it would result in getting less from the sale. I thought it was the worst question and missing the point but all leaders answered it as if it was a huge concern and how there'd need to be balance
Nobody really brought it up and nobody seemed to care in any of the coverage of that debate, even on that other site, so I thought maybe it would be a talking point
Every article I read speculating on the debate brought up Walz' response to the Minnesota protests but it didn't even come up unless I missed it? I was half expecting JD's closing statement to try and attack Tim on it, also half expecting it to turn into a pitch to sign up for Truth and Rumble
Trump just said he wants to lock up anyone who criticizes the Supreme Court, but self-admitted misinformation being removed from Facebook is the real problem
pretty sure America has legalized slave labour via the prison system
ok JD we get it your kids are beautiful
In the last Canadian debate one of the questions was that if you reduce housing prices how will the elderly who own all the houses afford their retirement. I thought it was ridiculous, but it's interesting that it's not even in the discussion tonight
JD got upset when Tim said Minnesota has the lowest teen pregnancy rate, it's kind of his thing
housing is up 60%?!?
folks folks folks
Yeasty