spujb

joined 2 years ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 4 weeks ago

ah!! the fellow archivist is a blahaj user!! hi @outerspec@blorbo.social / @outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone if ur on here 😌

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 50 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)
           MY ANTI DEPRESSANTS JUST KICKED
                 IN ! FANTASTIC !
                   __      _______ ______
                ╱    /\__/\       //     ╲╲
        ______⊂╱    ( ´∇`  )     // ⊃     ||╲ フ 🡖
      ,´__▔▔▔▔╱  ▔╱▔  ⌒▔▔▔▔╱▔▔▔▔ 🡖▔ ▔▔▔▔▔🡖 ▔▔▔▔ |
    ,╱_ _╱   /-o—/ ___ ╱▔▔╱ ___/\  |     ▔ | /\__|
   ,========————´=============/⌒ ╲=/=======||🡖 ||
   | __  |  GAY!  |   __ "    |⌒| |/    ___/|  )╯
   )|🞕|_∈≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡∋__|🞕|"  __|| ╯ ╯__ -‒‒‒‒‒┘  ╯
   ▔╲ ▔╲__╯▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔三三三▔╲  ╲__╯ ▔▔     三三三三╯
     三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
       三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三

OOP tweet (they explain in this thread that it’s from circa 2012): https://web.archive.org/web/20220906064951/https://twitter.com/DoctorPazuzu/status/1462926690192084994

pastebin archive (mildly unsatisfactory recreation, for example uses the wrong character for the headlights instead of perhaps 日): https://web.archive.org/web/20230612015658/https://pastebin.com/raw/Qv6EQTc6%0A%0A

recreation credit: https://web.archive.org/web/20220315124958/https://www.reddit.com/r/196/comments/r130ll/comment/i0qri9l/

work of a fellow archivist: https://web.archive.org/web/20250216214945/https://nonexistentfandomsfandom.neocities.org/AAcats/posts/antidepressants

have given up looking for older versions to archive but
~~if anyone knows how to search usenet communities that might be where the forum OOP got this from lives~~ actually i’m pretty sure https://www.4-ch.net/dqn/index.html is the forum as it perfectly matches the description—all posts are timestamped 1993-09

cute redraw:

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 month ago

hey at least cucks have a hobby that doesn’t hurt anyone

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

90 million americans were repressed from voting via a system that disproportionately benefits the higher income

300 million americans have been gerrymandered by capital owners (from both major parties) for decades

300 million americans have been systemically restricted from education funding

fixed that for you. educate your damn self.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

what you are doing is called victim blaming and it makes no one fucking respect you as an individual

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

so you hate waffles?

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

thank you for the correction

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago

do you exclusively type in non sequiturs or is it just under this post you decided this was an effective tactic?

i don’t even necessarily disagree with you but bro go make your own post about it

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

pretty sure this is about the general election, after the primary, thus it’s blue against red (or blue against blue against red since apparently cuomo is deciding not to take the hint)

im also maybe seeing that schumer was saying some stuff positive about mamdami but just didn’t endorse him?

i don’t have the time to figure out all that nuance before i send this reply so for now i’ll leave it as a question mark and encourage investigation into trusted sources

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago

what comfortable raspberry said

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 month ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

“vote blue no matter who” my ass

edit: also im seeing there’s some nuance and the person im replying too might not have been perfectly honest or trustworthy

 
 
830
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

he’s becoming self aware

title stolen from 13coveredinyou@twitter

756
yikes (lemmy.cafe)
 

Stolen from @vmstan

More analysis from @wiredfire:

It’s nothing to do with [difficulties in using multiple platforms]. It’s to do with the massive backlash they got on Fedi for their CEO being all Trumpy and somewhat horrible right wing. So they’ve run away because they were made to feel unwelcome on account of us not letting their BS fly.

Original screenshot is of the bio of https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy and wasn’t a post (that confused me for a sec).

1
rule (i.imgur.com)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

To clarify, white people are actually slightly underrepresented in terrorism per capita; they simply constitute a significant majority of the population and therefore do most of the terrorism. Therefore, while this tweet is technically correct, it should not be taken to mean that white individuals are more likely to be terrorists—it’s an ironic reflection on the skewed, racially motivated reality presented to us by media and politicians.

Source:

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/fbi-releases-lone-offender-terrorism-report-111319
https://www.statista.com/chart/19968/the-race-ethnicity-of-lone-offender-terrorists/ https://www.theroot.com/are-white-men-americas-biggest-terror-threat-we-checke-1830175112 https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/14/fbi-and-dhs-warned-of-growing-threat-from-white-supremacists-months-ago/

 
 

Posting this because no one else seems to want to, and it’s a discussion worth having outside of drama or personal conflicts. I’m undecided and can see both sides, but it’s important to address.

Potential benefits of a limit:

  • Frequent posters hold significant influence and could, in theory, push misinformation or propaganda (though I haven't seen evidence of this it’s a fair concern).
  • A community dominated by one or two voices might discourage new members from participating.
  • Encouraging quality over quantity could increase the value of individual posts.

Potential downsides of a limit:

  • Could reduce overall community engagement.
  • If set too low, it might discourage meaningful participation from well-intentioned members.
  • It could inadvertently encourage the (mis)use of alt accounts.

These are some pros/cons but certainly not all! I encourage more discussion below.

 
 

Summary:

  • @Cat@ponder.cat was posting at a high volume to !news@lemmy.world
  • there is no written rule on !news@lemmy.world about post volume
  • there is no written rule on ponder.cat about post volume
  • !news is the one single community Cat was this active in
  • !news has no ponder.cat mods
  • from my understanding, all rules Cat did break were unrelated to volume (correct me if I am wrong)
  • ponder.cat admin @PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat reaches out to Cat via comment and then DM essentially threatening account deletion if Cat doesn’t lower their activity level
  • Cat understandably deletes their account because who wants that

Of course, PhilipTheBucket had the right to do this, but I also think it’s exceedingly bad form and people have a right to know that this admin is willing to go above the community mods’ head like that.

Internet etiquette has dictates for dealing with undesirable yet not rule-breaking behavior that was just ignored here. Communication should be chosen before simple fist waving and threats.

I agree with this comment that this is a bait-provoked reaction. Next time I recommend:

  • at the instance/admin level, the creation of instance rules about volume
  • at the community level, advocacy for community rules about volume (i.e. “[Meta] Petition: Limit daily submissions to !news to ensure community quality”)
  • avoid personal slapfights to get your way
  • avoid escalation directly to account termination threats

Source: https://ponder.cat/post/1731587

view more: ‹ prev next ›