stormeuh

joined 4 months ago
[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And much before that it was rule-based machine learning, which was basically databases and fancy inference algorithms. So I guess "AI" has always meant "the most advanced computer science thing which looks kind of intelligent". It's only now that it looks intelligent enough to fool laypeople into thinking there actually is intelligence there.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For many people, including me, part of recovering from that abuse is accepting that you're significantly different compared to the average person. If you're ND and can't accept that, you might be masking and that can be really harmful.

That being said, there's still a difference between being called "different" or "weird", and if the latter is being hurled at you with malice by friends, they might not really be your friends...

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

But they do it stochastically, so you only have a suspicion watching gives you fewer ads, but aren't 100% sure

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 147 points 2 months ago (7 children)

IMO this should be the case for everything developed using public money, looking at you, pharmaceutical companies...

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Even if it's just playing back videos, it still should compensate for the distortion of the spherical display. That's a "simple" 3d transformation, but with the amount of pixels, coordinating between the GPUs and some redundancy, it doesn't seem like an excessive amount of computing power. The whole thing is still an impressive excess though...

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Who do you think the profit of increasing the price tag goes to? The workers in the factory to help them deal with inflation, or the rich shareholders?

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It is bias laundering though. They hide behind an "objective" algorithm, which was trained on a huge dataset of past ~~biased~~ hiring decisions.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Agreed, and I respectfully disagree with everyone else replying to you.

Relying on your car for your job is a much wider criterion than driving as your job. In car-centric places like the US (outside of the big cities) that's probably 99% of the population. Couple that with the piss poor social safety net and losing your license literally means starvation.

This still doesn't mean I endorse or agree with people driving distracted in any way. If revoking someone's license meant removing them from the road but not destroying their life, I would do that in a heartbeat.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

And they force you to use it if you want autosave, which is essential in a work environment given the stability of MS Office programs (or at least my ability to crash Excel).

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what happend the last few years with Lunduke, but it seems like he went down the conservative/conspiracy rabbit hole and now I don't trust anything he writes anymore. Please see for yourself, this article is a good starting point: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-tech-industry-hates-you?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Friendly FYI: Brave is based on Chromium, so under the hood it uses the same browser engine as Chrome. I can't recommend switching to Firefox enough, not only because it's a good and fully featured browser, but also because its existence is vital to keeping Google's power in check.

view more: ‹ prev next ›