supamanc

joined 1 year ago
[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I love how they say there are "tough decisions" to be made about benefits. You're going to cut benefits and cut taxes, same as you've been doing for the last 14 yrs, and any other time you had power. Why's it so tough? You should be really fucking good at it by now!

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a difference, but it's barely perceptible, therefore it makes no difference which one is picked. If you actually have a preference go with that one. Otherwise flip a coin.

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Wait, there are other protocols?

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Also, bones are supposed to be the sacrificial weak point, to protect the high value organs from shock damage. Having indestructible bones would lead to fucked up internal organs and brain damage.

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What a pointless question though. Obviously in the context 'Nazi' means what it means NOW.

'Peadophiles should be locked up' 'ah but what if the definition of Peadophile changes to incorporate anyone who has sex??'

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

In addition to the reply from the other chap, I'd point out that UEFA bought charges against city with absolutely no credible evidence and tried to ban them from competition. So I don't see how one could reach the conclusion that city bribed them?

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What evidence do have for these well documented FFP failings?

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You are correct, and the outcome of the hearing won't be known for a couple of years. However indications are that the PL is basing their charges on the Der Speigle documents (out of context, doctored emails stolen from MCFC and released by a convicteded fraudster and blackmailer). UEFA based their case on the same emails, and the CAS (European sporting appeal court) found that there was no veracity to them and no evidence of any wrong doing on MCFCs part, apart from non cooperation with UEFAs 'investigation'.

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

No they're not! They have the highest revenue in world football, and have one of the lowest 'net spends' (as useless as that metric is) of all the 'major teams' over the last 5 yrs. They are nowhere near failing FFP!

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What's illigal about Manchester City?

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Gdpr relates to data that can be used to identify you. Your username and content associated with it is not identifiable,so they are free to share it. Plus you agree to the sharing of that data when you sign up. Anything thst explicity ties your username to identifiable information such as email, ip, other usernames etc is controlled by Gdpr.

[–] supamanc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The goal short term isn't to be profitable though. The goal is to pull enough users so they can effectively stunt the growth of 'competition'.

view more: ‹ prev next ›