The least interesting member of the gruber family, they wrote him out of die hard 4.
swlabr
joined 2 years ago
FWIW as far as I can tell, bears are not native to Honduras
How many victory points is that
I 100% really did not intend for the name to work so well with that context but am once again thankful for all the gifts it brings.
jurisdictional polymath
To borrow a term from the podcast "Scam Goddess", a "serial entrepreneur", which in turn is just a scam artist.
Apple fanboys: "Apple has a singular, perfect vision for how people should interact with technology. I would get all my sensory organs replaced by Apple peripherals if I could. They should be allowed to trample us."
NB: apple has trampled over me but not my spirit
Truly a gift that shall keep on giving
This is fundamentally a part of any kind of race science or racism.
And fascism! Or any discriminatory -ism, up to and including capitalism.
In this article I’ll be making a distinction between what I call Hard WN and Soft WN.
In this article I will mostly be describing why I left Soft WN.
oh dawg
Post reads like he tried the penis implants mentioned in the stubsack and now has regrets
10^27 future lives
Ok here’s my Rat fermi-time traveller party paradox, in short, the Rat FTTP paradox.
- According to Rat doctrine, many worlds is true and science is amazing and will solve all problems eventually.
- Lack of time travel is a problem, meaning in some world, eventually there will be time travel, by 1.
- Lack of 10^27 people is a problem*, so we will also have that, also by 1.
The paradox: If time travel is so easy and there will be so many future lives, where are all the future rats?
No seriously, where are they? This FTTP orgy was supposed to start 24 hours ago.
My initial reaction was essentially a mix of “sorry to this man” and “well I don’t really expect psychology today to publish anything approaching meaningful on tech/ai” so I wanted to see if those reactions were justified. Well…
This makes PT look like a total rag. The author, John Nosta, bills himself as “The World’s Leading Innovation Theorist and Keynote Speaker” which really just sounds like “lecture circuit grifter” to me. Let’s take a look at the rest of his front page:
So yeah if you asked chatGPT to come up with the profile for an AI lecture circuit grifter, it’d probably look like the above.
Looking through his contributions to PT you might think he is just recycling armchair AI philosophy to make a quick buck and honestly I’m having a hard time thinking otherwise.