Gnome isn't locked-in. For being an important open source project, AWS has given Gnome credits so that they can use AWS free of charge for years. Once those credits expire, they are free to leave. So long as they do their proper preparation to migrate away, they get multiple years of hosting for free.
Gnome has already been in this circumstance. Their free hosting from another provider expired so they moved. Though as I'm researching this, I can't find the sources I've read this from.
Could you please explain further?
How does free infrastructure hosting from AWS hurt anyone? There’s no privacy concerns and this helps Gnome’s development.
The only way this will hurt is if Gnome is not prepared to switch away once their credits are up.
Amazon is giving this service to Gnome for free. If anything, this is hurting them.
For some reason, this has been getting a lot of push back on Gnome's Mastodon.
Keep in mind that this changes nothing for you as a Gnome user. It changes little even if you develop for Gnome. However, this frees of a lot of resources for Gnome. Gnome is getting the infrastructure for all their needs for free (for now) and don't need to worry about maintenance of the hardware.
I don't use Zoom enough to know, but it probably still works.
My last experience with the Zoom app on Wayland (a few months ago?) required me to do a manual config file change to launch the app properly. And Zoom says they fixed the screen sharing options, not sure how true that is.
Getting ready for Zoom to have instructions to install i3 rather than fixing their Wayland support.
I don’t get how a $600 could have such bad backlight bleed, but most laptops, not even high end ones, tend to be fine.
Gamescope is a compositor. It has many useful gaming features, but it doesn’t have a major performance advantage over desktops like Gnome, KDE, or tilers.
You could install Linux Mint onto a flash drive. Though keep in mind that flash drives aren't that robust, the flash chips are cheaper and will fail faster than SSDs.
Ubuntu had their own desktop called Unity that had a global menu. Gnome itself never did, though there were projects like Fildem to bring one to Gnome.
Edit: I was wrong, it used to have one
I was/am in a similar boat. Linux is my preferred OS, hate Windows, but I needed an OS that has good support for professional reasons.
My problem is that I hate the MacOS UX.
You can check if you are using Xorg or Wayland in the Settings -> System -> About -> System Details page. If you're using Wayland, you're all good, nothing changes. If you're using Xorg, you may notice some changes. If you're using NVIDIA on Ubuntu 24.04, you'll be on Xorg by default. If you're using a later version or AMD/Intel, you'll be on Wayland be default.
To keep it short, X11 was the old protocol for creating and managing windows. Xorg implemented this protocol. But both the protocol and implementation have many shortcomings that are difficult to address for a multitude of reasons (breaking compatibility, poor code base, a ton of work, etc).
Rather than putting lipstick on a pig, a new protocol, called Wayland, was created. It was designed for modern needs and tries to avoid the pitfalls that X11, Windows, and MacOS have. It doesn't just copy what those three did, it's more opinionated, so some people love it a lot (like me) or hate it a lot because it changes the way things have to be done and simply does not implement some functionality, either purposefully or because the work hasn't been done yet.