theHRguy

joined 1 year ago
 

The Lie of the “Failed State”

It’s become something of a journalistic reflex: call Haiti a “failed state,” imply its dysfunction is homegrown, and lament how, despite international aid and good intentions, nothing ever seems to work.

This is dishonest.

Haiti is not failing on its own. It’s being deliberately sabotaged. Its institutions weren’t just weak — they were gutted. Its economy isn’t underdeveloped — it’s been systematically looted. And the so-called international community? More like the international criminal syndicate, with Washington and Paris at the top of the food chain. Independence — and Immediate Punishment

Start with the foundational crime. In 1804, Haiti did the unthinkable: it overthrew its French enslavers, routed Napoleon’s army, and declared itself the world’s first Black republic. It was the only successful slave revolt in history.

That act of liberation sparked panic across the slaveholding world. The U.S. refused to recognize Haiti for nearly 60 years. France, ever the colonial extortionist, demanded reparations — from the formerly enslaved. In 1825, under threat of reinvasion, Haiti agreed to pay French slaveholders 150 million francs (roughly $21 billion in today’s dollars) for the loss of their “property.”

To pay it, Haiti took out predatory loans from French banks. The ransom bled the country dry for generations. A 2017 analysis pegged the economic impact at $115 billion in lost GDP. Think of it as the first IMF-style structural adjustment — before the IMF even existed. The U.S. Occupation and the Seeds of Sabotage

Then came the Marines.

In 1915, the United States invaded, occupied, and reengineered Haiti’s political system to serve American business interests. U.S. forces seized the national bank, rewrote the constitution to allow foreign land ownership, and imposed forced labor — not for the benefit of Haitians, but for American corporations.

When the occupation ended in 1934, it left behind a militarized state and a ruling elite friendly to Washington. The pattern was established: Haiti would be run by locals, but governed in the interests of foreign capital. Duvalier Dictatorship, U.S. Backing

That foreign-backed system reached its grotesque peak with the Duvaliers — François “Papa Doc” and his son Jean-Claude “Baby Doc.” They ruled with iron fists and death squads, building one of the most brutal dictatorships of the 20th century. The U.S. sent weapons, cash, and praise. All in the name of “anti-communism.”

Haiti became a model client state: impoverished, dependent, but obedient. Aristide and the Crime of Caring

This arrangement was briefly interrupted by Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a former Catholic priest who dared to believe the Haitian poor deserved education, food, and dignity. Elected in a landslide in 1990, he was quickly overthrown by the military.

When Aristide returned in 2000, he raised the minimum wage and called on France to return the $21 billion in stolen “reparations.” He was punished for his audacity. In 2004, U.S. forces abducted him at gunpoint and flew him into exile. A coup in all but name.

His removal cleared the path for technocrats, NGOs, and “stabilization forces” to run the country from hotel boardrooms. The UN, the Earthquake, and the Great Aid Heist

After Aristide came the United Nations occupation — an unaccountable foreign force that introduced cholera into Haiti’s water supply, killing over 10,000 people. No apology, no justice.

Then came the 2010 earthquake, which killed more than 300,000. International donors pledged $13 billion. Less than 1% went to Haitian institutions. The rest lined the pockets of international NGOs, foreign contractors, and Beltway-connected firms.

The Clinton Foundation oversaw much of the reconstruction effort. Its signature project? An industrial park for sweatshops making clothes for U.S. retailers — built miles from the quake zone. Meanwhile, U.S. rice, subsidized by Washington, flooded Haitian markets and destroyed local agriculture.

Aid became extraction. Charity became conquest in khakis. Assassination, Gangs, and Manufactured Chaos

In 2021, Haiti’s president Jovenel Moïse was assassinated in his home. The hit squad included mercenaries tied to DEA informants and U.S. security firms. No real investigation followed.

In the chaos, an unelected prime minister, Ariel Henry, took power — backed by the U.S. and largely ruling by decree. Meanwhile, armed gangs multiplied across Port-au-Prince, many linked to the same business elite who profited from coups and foreign contracts. Guns flowed in from Florida. Impunity reigned.

This isn’t state failure. It’s state capture. Haiti Didn’t Fail. It Was Made to Fail.

Haiti’s condition today is not the result of bad luck or poor leadership. It is the product of centuries of calculated interference, foreign plunder, and elite betrayal. It was punished for freeing itself from slavery, looted for daring to be sovereign, and sabotaged whenever it tried to chart its own course.

So the next time you hear someone say Haiti is a “failed state,” correct them.

It didn’t fail.

It was pillaged.

 

Get ready to have your mind blown by “BlackRock’s Bitcoin Scheme: How Wall Street Giants Are Bilking Poor People Out of Money.” This video dives deep into the shocking reality behind the Bitcoin hype and exposes how BlackRock and other Wall Street titans are quietly taking over the crypto world while everyday people are left holding the bag.

In “BlackRock’s Bitcoin Scheme: How Wall Street Giants Are Bilking Poor People Out of Money,” you’ll learn how just 1% of entities control nearly 90% of all Bitcoin, and how BlackRock alone has amassed over 530,000 BTC—making them the second-largest holder on the planet. The video breaks down how institutional giants use thousands of wallets to hide their concentration of wealth, while the media and crypto influencers keep pushing the myth of “decentralization.”

We’ll also reveal how new deregulation moves—like Trump’s rollback of IRS crypto broker rules and the SEC’s so-called “innovation-friendly” policies—are making it even easier for Wall Street to dominate, while retail investors get crushed by scams and volatility. “BlackRock’s Bitcoin Scheme: How Wall Street Giants Are Bilking Poor People Out of Money” is your wake-up call: Bitcoin isn’t the revolution you were promised. It’s become another playground for the rich, and the real winners are the same financial giants you thought you were escaping.

 

On October 21, 1967, history witnessed one of the most bizarre and unforgettable protests of all time: the day 100,000 hippies, activists, and peace lovers descended on Washington, D.C. to attempt the impossible—levitating the Pentagon. Led by countercultural icons like Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, this massive anti-Vietnam War demonstration began with a rally at the Lincoln Memorial, featuring speeches from Dr. Benjamin Spock and performances by folk singers, before marching across the Potomac to the Pentagon itself

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

The Luddites were right to be upset at technology because the rapid introduction of automated textile machinery directly threatened their livelihoods and the economic stability of their communities. Skilled workers who had long relied on their craft were suddenly replaced by cheaper, less skilled labor operating new machines, leading to mass unemployment, falling wages, and widespread poverty. The new factory system also undermined established labor practices, eroded job security, and forced workers into harsher conditions for lower pay, all while the government and factory owners prioritized profit over workers’ well-being. Their protests were not against technology itself, but against the way it was used to exploit labor and destabilize traditional ways of life without offering protections or fair compensation to those displaced.

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Crime rates: The United States has significantly higher crime rates compared to Qatar

Crime Index: United States (49.34) vs Qatar (15.99)
Safety Scale: United States (50.66) vs Qatar (84.01)

Perception of safety: Qatar is perceived as much safer than the United States Level of crime: United States (Moderate 55.23) vs Qatar (Very Low 10.24) Safety walking alone during night: United States (Moderate 44.29) vs Qatar (Very High 80.83)

Overall safety: Qatar is considered one of the safest places in the world, with very low crime rates

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Based on the search results provided, there are several points that suggest the evidence of Gaddafi's human rights abuses may have been exaggerated or misrepresented due to Western media bias:

  1. Manufactured pretext: The search results indicate that Western powers may have manufactured a pretext to intervene in Libya, claiming Gaddafi was preparing a massacre of civilians[5]. This suggests that the narrative of Gaddafi's human rights abuses may have been amplified or distorted to justify intervention.

  2. Limited evidence of large-scale attacks: A report cited in the search results states that "Gaddafi's 40-year record of appalling human rights abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians"[5]. This contradicts the narrative often presented in Western media at the time.

  3. Exaggeration of death tolls: The search results mention that Western media misrepresented the number of deaths related to the conflict. Before NATO intervention, the UN estimated the death toll at around 2,000. However, after six months of NATO intervention, the death toll rose to nearly 50,000, with a significant proportion being civilians[5].

  4. Selective reporting: The search results suggest that Western media emphasized Gaddafi's crimes while downplaying or ignoring the actions of anti-Gaddafi rebels. This selective reporting may have created a biased picture of the situation[1].

  5. Lack of context: The coverage often lacked nuance and failed to acknowledge the complexities of the situation in Libya, instead portraying Gaddafi and his regime as "evil others" without giving serious consideration to their claims[1].

  6. Post-intervention situation: The search results indicate that the human rights situation in Libya has worsened since Gaddafi's overthrow, suggesting that the narrative of intervention to protect human rights may have been flawed[2].

  7. Flawed trial: The trial of Gaddafi-era officials was criticized for serious due process violations, raising questions about the legitimacy of some accusations against the regime[4].

It's important to note that while these points suggest bias in Western media reporting, they do not necessarily prove that Gaddafi did not commit human rights abuses. Rather, they indicate that the extent and nature of these abuses may have been misrepresented or exaggerated in Western media coverage, potentially due to political motivations and bias.

Citations: [1] https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3013&context=masters_theses [2] https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20230413-libyas-human-rights-situation-is-worse-than-what-it-was-under-gaddafi/ [3] https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/biased-bigoted-boorish-thats-western-media-reporting-on-qatar-2022-12780162 [4] https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/07/28/libya-flawed-trial-gaddafi-officials [5] https://www.declassifieduk.org/why-the-media-arent-telling-the-whole-story-of-libyas-floods/

https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-details-how-natos-2011-war-in-libya-was-based-on-lies/

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

The issue of human rights abuses in Qatar and their portrayal in Western media is complex and nuanced. While there are legitimate concerns about human rights in Qatar, some argue that Western media coverage has been exaggerated or hypocritical in certain ways:

  1. Exaggeration of worker deaths: Some Western media outlets have been criticized for misrepresenting the number of migrant worker deaths related to World Cup construction. Reports often failed to clarify that cited death tolls covered a 10-year period and were not solely related to FIFA projects[4].

  2. Selective criticism: There are arguments that Western media has applied selective criteria in its concerns, focusing intensely on Qatar while overlooking similar issues in other countries, including in the West[3][4].

  3. Lack of context: Some coverage has been accused of lacking nuance or failing to acknowledge Qatar's recent reforms. In 2021, Qatar enacted significant labor rights reforms, including establishing a minimum wage and prohibiting outdoor work during peak summer heat[3].

  4. Cultural bias: Some Qatari officials have suggested that the intense scrutiny reflects a broader pattern of Western bias against Arabs and Muslims[3].

  5. Hypocrisy: Critics point out that Western countries and companies have benefited from and been complicit in labor practices in the Gulf region for decades[2][4].

  6. Reforms and responsiveness: Some argue that Qatar's responsiveness to international pressure to improve its human rights situation may make it a more appropriate host for global events compared to other countries with poor human rights records[3].

However, it's important to note that legitimate human rights concerns in Qatar do exist:

  1. Migrant worker issues: Despite reforms, there are still concerns about the treatment of migrant workers, who make up about 85% of Qatar's population but do not have the same rights as citizens[3].

  2. LGBTQ+ rights: Human rights groups have documented discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals in Qatar[3].

  3. Political freedoms: The U.S. State Department reports issues including arbitrary arrest, political prisoners, and restrictions on free expression[5].

In conclusion, while some Western media coverage of human rights issues in Qatar may have been exaggerated or biased in certain instances, there are still genuine human rights concerns in the country that warrant attention and continued efforts for improvement.

Citations: [1] https://www.wzb.eu/en/world-cup-and-human-rights-in-qatar-where-the-propaganda-effect-failed [2] https://theprint.in/opinion/western-medias-criticism-of-qatar-world-cup-has-truth-but-with-dollops-of-hypocrisy/1231641/ [3] https://theconversation.com/the-world-cup-puts-the-spotlight-on-qatar-but-also-brings-attention-to-its-human-rights-record-and-politics-4-things-to-know-194970 [4] https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/biased-bigoted-boorish-thats-western-media-reporting-on-qatar-2022-12780162 [5] https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/qatar/

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sounds a lot like america, and yeah i was talking about gaddafi, not Qatar. But yeah turns out no country is perfect, you fucking imbecile. Way to cite western media too, really non biased! You must be another child masquerading as an adult. Go ahead lets hear about Gaddafi...im all ears, junior

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

the fonz was more open minded than that

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

way to think for yourself

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

So you are a Fascist sympathizer got it!

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gaddafi’s Achievements:

Economic Prosperity: Under Gaddafi, Libya transformed from one of the poorest countries in the world to the country with the highest Human Development Index in Africa. The nationalization of oil resources allowed Libya to invest heavily in social programs and infrastructure.

Education: Gaddafi’s government prioritized education, raising the literacy rate from 25% to 88%. Education was free at all levels, and students often received scholarships to study abroad.

Healthcare: Libya developed a robust, free healthcare system that was considered one of the best in the Middle East and North Africa. Life expectancy increased from 51 to 74 years during Gaddafi’s rule.

Housing: Gaddafi considered housing a human right. His government provided interest-free loans for home purchases and implemented extensive public housing projects.

Women’s Rights: Gaddafi’s Libya was progressive in terms of women’s rights for the region. Women had equal rights to education, employment, and divorce.

Infrastructure: The Great Man-Made River project, one of the largest irrigation projects in the world, was initiated to provide water to Libya’s desert regions.

African Unity: Gaddafi was a strong advocate for African unity and independence from Western influence, often using Libya’s oil wealth to support other African nations.

[–] theHRguy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ground beef prices are lower in the USA compared to New Zealand due to government subsidies for grain production, which makes it cheaper for American cattle to be grain-fed. In contrast, New Zealand has eliminated agricultural subsidies, so their cattle are primarily grass-fed[3].

Specifically:

  • In the USA, grain farmers receive heavy government subsidies, artificially driving down grain prices. This makes it economical for large cattle operations to feed grain to their animals[2].

  • New Zealand is an island nation, so it is not feasible to ship in large amounts of grain to feed cattle. It makes more economic sense for them to raise cattle on grass[2].

  • The USA's indirect farm support programs, like buybacks and checkoffs, aim to boost demand for meat, thereby raising its price. However, these subsidies only slightly lower grain costs[3].

  • Nations that have eliminated farm subsidies, like New Zealand, have not seen rising meat prices or declines in meat consumption after removing subsidies[3].

So in summary, while both countries produce grass-fed beef, the availability of cheap grain through subsidies allows American producers to offer ground beef at lower prices compared to New Zealand's grass-fed beef, which lacks the same level of government support[1][2][3].

Citations: [1] http://newzealmeats.com/blog/nz-grass-fed-beef-high-quality/ [2] https://www.folsompointnutrition.com/blog/new-zealand-argentinian-and-american-liver-supplements-what-are-the-differences [3] https://faunalytics.org/why-is-meat-so-cheap/ [4] https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/omxum2/why_red_meat_is_getting_more_expensive/ [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_New_Zealand

view more: next ›