theplanlessman

joined 1 year ago
[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The shortest song I ever found at a karaoke place was You Suffer by Napalm Death. It's 1.3 seconds long.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

My city has been stuck trying to expand its tram system for decades at this point, but whenever I mention that we could introduc trolley buses instead people look at me like I'm crazy!

They just make so much sense for our use case. We're a hilly city, so the rubber tyres are more suitable than steel on steel, the routes they want to build on don't really have the space for separated infrastructure, so having buses that can run on the roads will be less disruptive, and by not having to install rails they're a lot cheaper too.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 18 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Because images like this are still relevant no matter how the cars are powered.

Running an electric car is obviously greener than running an ICE car, but producing one is most definitely not environmentally friendly. If we can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, including electric cars, that would go a long way to reducing carbon emissions.

There's also the case to be made around the environmental impact of (sub)urban sprawl, which generally comes about as a direct result of car dependency.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

For what it's worth the UK uses mph and we've had the Internet for a little while now too, and here e-scooters are technically illegal to ride anywhere other than on private land, i.e. not on pavement, on bike lanes or on the road.

The exception is if you're in one of the cities which is operating a "trial" rental scheme, in which case the rental company will let you know where they think you should ride. But I believe even in those areas privately owned e-scooters remain illegal to use in public.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Well I certainly wouldn't want to change my pupils without their consent, that's for sure!

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

FYI the English name of that cask is "tun".

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The bicycle industry really needs to settle on a singe bottom bracket standard. It's not like there's a significant difference in performance from the million different variations. An industry-standard rear derailleur hanger would also save a lot of headaches where people try to hunt down a replacement for a frame that's been out of production for years.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This has always been the case in the UK and I hate it. My city actually planned on banning it on two of the busiest roads in the city (because obviously people constantly pulling in and out of traffic will always make it worse), but the drivers protested and now the plan is scrapped.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, that makes sense. For what it's worth I think you guys are on the right track with e-bikes; allow more powerful motors but give them a different classification.

What are things like on that side of the pond? The "20's plenty" campaign is well underway over here, do you have similar movements in the US?

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that's the difference in scale between here and Reddit. r/fuckcars was tiny compared to the whole of reddit, but I guess this is large enough to be prominent in Everything.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's been surprising to see just how many pro-car users seem to lurk on these anti-car/pro-alternative transport communities.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've found it interesting how many more pro-car and anti-bike people their are in the lemmy version of fuckcars compared to the Reddit one.

view more: ‹ prev next ›