thief_of_names

joined 2 months ago
[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

Your issue is you have two boxes, female and male, when intersex conditions are the result of sex being a spectrum. Intersex conditions can happen in a multitude of ways, and many are not very outwardly detectable.

Masulinization and feminization is a complicated and messy process which results in people with sexual characteristics outside the binary, and sometimes this means that people are born infertile or less fertile, which invalidates your point. Biologically it's asinine to say that bio sex is binary.

You say if someone belongs to the sex which can have babies then they are biologically women. How do you define if someone belongs to the sex which can have babies? Your definition doesn't describe this, you just arbitrarily put someone into the woman box.

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Then say that instead? You started a completely irrelevant discussion

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorders_of_sex_development

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190741/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/mostly-male-woman-gives-birth-to-twins-in-medical-miracle-10033528.html

Biological sex is not binary, and the purpose of women isn't just squeezing children out. I called your logic terfy because your talking points are eerily similar to theirs.

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Biology is far more complicated than you make it out to be. You are also invalidating cis people with your terfy logic about producing babies

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's pretty clear you didn't watch the video.

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cajun spice contains garlic! You're safe

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have 6 ears ??

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty sure each of the companies selling smart home systems like this want to become the dominant go to system, so focusing on earning profits doesn't make much sense. You want to lure customers into your ecosystem and for your solution to become so dominant you become a monopoly, or at least so you don't fall behind and let someone else become ubiquitous. I view it as amazon building infrastructure and supporting future endeavors.

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't heard about piefed before, but I'll be keeping an eye on this one as well. Thanks!

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago

This sounds familiar! I think this is it! Thank you very much

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Dunno? More moderation tools in general. Lemmy mods regularly complain about a lack of tools, but I've never moderated anything so I wouldn't know. The project page probably describes what additional tools it has which is one of the things I'm interested in reading about.

Perhaps some moderators can chime in with what kinda stuff they miss or want?

view more: ‹ prev next ›