Free and Open Source Software

17926 readers

43 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Lemmy alternative (beehaw.org)

submitted 3 months ago by thief_of_names@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi! I remember there beings talks about beehaw planning to eventually move to a lemmy alternative with proper moderation tools, and was interested in following the development of this alternative, but I've forgotten the name of the project and can't find the specific posts about the subject. Anyone remember what I'm talking about?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 3 months ago (7 children)

what are proper moderation tools though?

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dunno? More moderation tools in general. Lemmy mods regularly complain about a lack of tools, but I've never moderated anything so I wouldn't know. The project page probably describes what additional tools it has which is one of the things I'm interested in reading about.

Perhaps some moderators can chime in with what kinda stuff they miss or want?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

FYI, here's all the moderation things outstanding: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/labels/area%3A%20moderation

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not a list of things BeeHaw finds lacking though.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, there's been a lot of updates and a lot of moderation tools improvements since the version that beehaw has deployed was released.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Just providing context for folks who may not be familiar with GitHub

load more comments (5 replies)