underscores

joined 2 years ago

I love how anteaters and sloths used to be lumped together with primates in the 1740s.

 

A list of all the fun ways people used to group creatures together that make no biological sense.

 

A list of all the fun ways people used to group creatures together that make no biological sense.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 5 days ago (28 children)

I really don't like the idea of citing this study. It's always this same one from the 90s, and if it were acurate I expect the results would have been reproduced more. It's also not clear that the results indicate what the paper says. There's other reasons than sexual arousal that could explain the results. It could be they're imagining the scenario and are axious or disgusted by it. There's this paper that indicates homophobia is usually caused by fear or hate.

I don't like the idea of putting the blame for homophobia on closeted queer people. It's seems extremely likely to me that most homophobic people are straight, since most people are straight. Also we should respect other people's own identification instead of trying to force labels on people, even if they're bigots.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesn't have traffic data, which is probably the biggest disadvantage. The maps are user contributed, so the quality varies widely. Depending on where you are, it'll be ridiculously detailed with individual bushes in a park, or it's incorrect or outdated and you can't find your destination. I usually use this or OSMand, but I still keep google maps on another profile as a backup.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't have a good enough grasp on the topic to fully vouch for the site, but I've found pluralpedia.org really useful and interesting.

I think he's literally talking about investing in fediverse companies, which I guess isn't really any better.

At least in the case I remember it wasn't a bot network. They would just put them on popular playlists so it'd end up with tons of listens. They were basically fake bands created as a way to get around paying licensing fees. If there's no real band there's no royalties to pay.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't used it but there's ProxiTok.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

For android I tend to like Safe Notes. It's relatively simple, encrypted with either passphrase or biometrics, and stored locally, with a way to back up to a file. Just make sure you memorize/save the passphrase so you don't lose your entries. It's android only though, if that matters. I only use it for shorter stuff, so I'm not sure how well it works for longer entries.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't used Chameleon, but it seems to do some stuff like change the user agent that JShelter doesn't do. I'd assume it's more useful to get around a site designed for a specific browser or operating system.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

JShelter isn't mainly for spoofing, it's about blocking a bunch of potentially harmful advanced javascript features, often used for tracking. Any spoofing is mostly to keep sites working with the missing javascript features.

I have it installed on one of my browsers. I wouldn't recommend using it unless you're willing to tweak the settings for new sites you visit, because I've had it break sites pretty often with the default settings.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's at a very different level. With dot social it's about a quarter of the active users on the fediverse, whereas bluesky is probably something like 95% centralized in practice. It seems to keep improving, but right now it's basically impossible to use without mostly interacting with bsky.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

I started watching a playlist on how to design a puppet from scratch. I find puppets facinating but never looked into how they're built.

 

drawn on my phone using pocket paint

 

Those top players represent a mere 0.01% of all bitcoin holders and yet they control 27% of the digital currency, the Wall Street Journal reported. That compares to the old-fashion dollar, where the top 1% controlled 30% of total U.S. household wealth, according to Federal Reserve data.

view more: next ›