unwaveringegg

And the same party that cries about stochastic terrorism now doesn't believe it either.

Well done.

No, I got my answer: You're a coward.

Good coping, jackass. You were looking for a gotcha moment and instead got egg on your face.

Its okay, child, the mean, disingenious person will stop bothering you and hurting your fee fees with snark.

The conversation didn't go the direction you wanted to. I'm sorry you feel that way. You don't have the intellectual maturity to engage in good faith conversations and that's something you need to sort out yourself.

Is the Pixel Fold 2 off the table? Doesn't seem like that really took off as they wanted it to.

If you're going to spend all this time, lets just hear your answers.

I can spend my time addressing how disingenuous you are.

Lets give you the benefit of the doubt, assume its an error and you're not a liar who is such a coward about sharing their opinion they would rather accuse people repeatedly of responding in bad faith to poison the discussion than answer a simple pair of snarky questions honestly.

You searched through this sub to find someone to answer your snarky questions. If you were being sincere, I don't think you would ask in the way you did.

Again, why pretend you're actually interested in having a civil discourse when you started off on the wrong foot? And you clearly picked the wrong person since I'm not a conservative as what you asked are conservative values.

Perhaps you should rethink how you approach others with political disagreements next time. Cause this sounds like a skill issue on your part.

not interesting

competency is only your opinion

So just say you think he's competent despite all evidence.

You're conflating two separate points I made because naturally, you cannot fathom why "Family Values" isn't interesting to me, but I understand why you did it.

This is your opportunity to explain yourself and you keep responding which says you want to address ... something.

Explain myself for what? I'm not a conservative. You used ™ in your snarky post because you assumed I was a conservative - because those are their values .

Either way, my motivation here is curiosity. Answer, don't answer, but I will keep poking until you decide its not worth your time to keep waffling.

I'm responding to you only because I know you're being disingenuous. So why are you pretending like you actually care?

That's a lot of words to not answer either question.

I explained why. And you're not asking in good faith either.

I would imagine anyone voting for somebody would be able to answer why they think their candidate was competent.

People vote on certain issues and the ones you mentioned aren't interesting to me. And competency is only your opinion. You hate people who are voting for Trump so why are you pretending like you really care to know the answers to these questions?

This doesn't rank high in my priorities. You'll need to ask an actual conservative - Trump and I aren't conservatives.

Though, I'm thinking you're a bad faith jackass looking through your comments and the sarcastic approach to your questioning.

Are you really out here trying to own the MAGAs? Lmao

It'll probably take several years for them to switch over to MLS. Hopefully other messaging apps like Telegram and Threema can also utilize it just for crossplatform purposes.

I was going to vote for him anyways. It's very obvious some of these misdemeanors were upgraded to felonies only because he's Trump.

I'm not a conservative - but I'm still voting for him. Very obvious what they are doing here.

These features that have been rolling out to Beta users since November must be those with Pixel devices. Everyone else is not getting them.