uzay

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

+ 30โ‚ฌ vertical stand ๐Ÿคก

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

I have a deck and know how to play, I'd be down to try it

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I see. That is a valid concern. Though it feels unfair to say that headscale is 'made by a tailscale employee'. From what I understand, one of the main contributors of headscale was hired by tailscale, though he is not the only maintainer and does not own the repo from what I can tell. Still, Tailscale could decide to cede all support of headscale and that would likely hurt the project a lot. In the same way however nebula could decide to switch to proprietary licenses and discontinue their open source offerings.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

What made you choose Nebula over Tailscale? I'm running it through a self-hosted Headscale server and it's working well so far. I haven't looked into Nebula too much.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago

Your arguments read like you believe a DRM-protected ebook file is a verbatim copy that can be freely distributed and used. I just want to clarify that it is not, not even on a technical level. The form of DRM that libraries use is not just a license you agree to. It is an ecryption that turns that ebook into a garbled mess for anyone but the person who borrowed the ebook, during a set timeframe. After that period expires it cannot be decrypted anymore and stays a garbled mess forever, irrevocably ceasing to be a copy.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I probably would have never heard of it. Now I really want to play it.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago
[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Looks like it could be a neat device, I wonder if it'll bump up the $200 price point though. Also I was hoping for a Pocket Flip 2, but that is getting less likely at this point I guess.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Huh thanks,, I guess it's based on a misunderstanding of the word kebab then. Correctly it would have to be called ลŸiลŸ/shish case then, but that certainly has less of a ring to it.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Snake case or kebab case I guess. But why is it called kebab case?

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

I started self-hosting a music server locally on a Raspberry Pi long before I switched careers to go into IT. I actually learned a lot that way.

[โ€“] uzay@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you restrict it, then it isn't public. I'm not saying that encrypted group chats are useless. But if it is public and anyone can join anyway, then encryption adds no secrecy.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ