[-] villasv@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Tldr climate apocalypse for the coffee plant might shift the market towards alternative plants. While technically true that coffee plantations will struggle in the coming years, this just means higher prices and worse average quality off the shelf.

A bit of nothing news, imho.

Coffee alternatives like rooibos are already here and the market is very resistant. Cheap coffee drinkers are irrationally attached to the bad taste they feel nostalgic for. Fancy coffee drinkers will absorb the higher costs without looking for alternatives. It’s only the tea-adventurous coffee drinkers that care about these innovations, usually due to caffeine consumption restrictions which is also a disputed market because decaf coffee quality is improving.

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Dark roast does have more caffeine per gram, because there are more beans per gram, because beans become lighter as roasting continues and more CO2 is released.

Counting caffeine per bean indeed darker roasts have less caffeine, but it’s a tiny tiny difference, so the effect of the whole bean getting lighter wins out when measuring caffeine per weight.

As for decaf, all methods affect taste. Swiss Water isn’t inherently better. Water is a chemical solvent. Is this an ad?

1
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by villasv@beehaw.org to c/coffee@lemmy.ca
[-] villasv@beehaw.org 8 points 6 months ago

It has been great! First holiday season away from my family as a newly minted expat, but I’m lucky to have four/five other couples from my home country going through pretty much the same thing, so we’ve been each others support . Me and my partner are positively surprised at how well things have been working (mostly)!

1
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by villasv@beehaw.org to c/coffee@lemmy.ca
1
submitted 6 months ago by villasv@beehaw.org to c/coffee@lemmy.ca
[-] villasv@beehaw.org 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Firefox is just the only option. And while at it, use Piped or Invidious while you still can, people!

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Holy guacamole, Argentina was at the precipice's edge and finally decided to take a step forward

Sorry for the comrades who will have to deal with this hell

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 21 points 7 months ago

So really it’s just a polite way of saying “yeah you better be thankful.”

lol that escalated quickly

When I hear "you're welcome" the only thing I think of is that I'm welcome

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 10 points 7 months ago

It can be useful for bureaucracy

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 10 points 7 months ago

Only in a few select shit democracies can a company push back on a government entity trying to do something so basic as to provide decent tax filling mechanisms

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago

I’m placing my bets on piped video instead, for now at least. YouTube needs something more tragic, like getting acquired by Elon Musk, before it bleeds for real.

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

H-h-how? HOW? do they ‘anonymize’ DNA?!?!

If you really curious, it is possible depending on the sections of the DNA being shared and how aggregated they are. Not saying that this will be the case - it's quite likely that this sale would be done prioritizing value instead of privacy - but it is possible. The key part is to not treat the whole DNA as a data sample, but specific sequence sections, as isolated as possible.

And the Netflix example is instructive but not super relevant here. If you already have your SNPs in a public database out there, then yeah 23andMe might not be able to effectively anonymize your samples; but you don't (I hope).

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 13 points 8 months ago

At this point I'm just holding for dear life to piped.video, because illegal front-ends are my only hope to keep watching YouTube.

[-] villasv@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My biggest tip is to not be stingy with dishwasher usage. If you already have one, use it always.

  • The cheapest store brand powder detergent works fine and its way cheaper than liquid dishwashing detergent for manual usage
  • Some people like to think they're super water-efficient doing the dishes, but they're not; dishwasher saves water.
  • The only extra cost is electricity, but it's easily offset by the savings brought by cooking more often caused by the reduced hassle of doing the dishes. It's like 1-2 dollars of electricity per use (YMMV but it's that order of magnitude: less than a tenth of a dine out).
view more: next ›

villasv

joined 8 months ago