weirdwallace75

joined 1 year ago
[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Prove what? That you can't cite a law?

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

You're saying absolute goddamned nonsense.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

If he's always on top of things, why is he doing this now and not sooner?

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, wrong. Or else teachers would be able to make copies of textbooks, and they're not.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, this is definitely wrong. Giving away something you don't own is still illegal.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hm. You have very little knowledge of American healthcare.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's beyond bad taste and into active stupidity.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Google's gotten worse, but some people are still asking it questions in natural language and have absolutely no idea how quotes work.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This towel is warmer and bitier than usual.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There are whole-ass companies selling laptops with Linux preinstalled now. They work. Even with Bluetooth.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You skipped glass as an option.

Glass is heavy and fragile, and dangerous when it breaks.

29
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by weirdwallace75@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
 

A good post about the kinds of arguments people use online, including tactics which are about the argument itself or some of the people involved in the argument, as opposed to being about the argument's supposed topic.

You should know this to, one, avoid pointless "debates" where no actual issues get debated, two, to improve your own debate style to focus on the issues that need to be debated most, and, three, to see when others are merely acting like they're debating without actually debating the core issues the debate is supposed to be about.

view more: next ›