Yeah. The most obvious change is that they could simply stop issuing new bonds to match new deficits. They could do that tomorrow. Capitalists would still be getting their interest on existing ones, but no new giveaways (at least in this form). Nothing revolutionary, but at least an incrementalism which is slightly on the good side. Still, it's not going to happen until at least half of the neoliberals are given the axe (figuratively, of course 
).
ziggurter
joined 2 years ago
Starting about 125 years ago, yeah. And accelerating rapidly about 80 years ago.
Dunno. Maybe.
Wait, wait, wait. Hold the crabs. Fucker has the best healthcare the Empire can manage. I do NOT want to be disappointed on this one.
To be fair, Mearsheimer seems to take the stance that he thinks it's in the U.S.'s (state) interests to go after China, but doesn't seem to personally like that fact or anything. Though he tends not to talk about the latter as much as the former.
He's a weird dude. I don't blame anyone for being skeptical of his motives, and subscribe to that skepticism quite a bit myself, too.
Many of those are still fascists but have slipped the mask on, too. Fuck 'em. I'm trying to keep them out of /r/BreadTube, at least, though 
is probably very much a lost cause. LOL.
Hmm. What he says seems to contradict what China claimed. They said there is solid evidence that COVID entered China on international shipments of refrigerated food, and that reports by the W.H.O. and other organizations confirm that. Sachs claims the U.S. government just mailed the virus to a lab in Wuhan for them to test it on their bats. Also, he claims the idea was to somehow make bats immune to corona viruses, and that it was a success. But...this was actually an infection of a very active and deadly virus? Some of this doesn't seem to add up though I'm very far from an epidemiologist....
LOL. So funny. Making it explicit that not even minor shareholders matter to capitalism. It's all about the capitalists.
No, but you see, It's Not Fair™. Checkmate, realists.
I mean, literally the way liberal legalism works is that the state can charge anyone with anything at any time. The only question is how likely the case is to be successful.
it isn't going back in the bottle
Sure hope not. But I don't like to underestimate their willingness to (try to) shove things back into fucking bottles either, TBH. Like if Trump and Netanyahu kiss and make up or whatever. 
Did Finnish authorities blame the mass stabbing on knives?
(God, how ridiculous it sounds without the decades of liberal propaganda normalizing it.)